Did the Climate Crisis Play a Role in Storm Hilary?

“Warmer oceans are hurricane fuel,” an expert said.

A man near his car trapped in flood waters in Los Angeles.Yannick Peterhans/SOPA Images/Zuma Press

This story was originally published by the Guardian and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

Questions loom about what role the climate crisis played in supercharging Storm Hilary and whether there could be more like it in the future.

After a year of weather extremes in California and the US west—including record-breaking winter rain and snowfall and punishing summer heatwaves—the tropical cyclone’s appearance in the region remains extraordinary.

The last time a tropical storm made landfall in southern California was in 1939, according to the National Weather Service. And meteorologists believe the only tropical cyclone churning at hurricane force to hit the state was in 1858.

The storm reached the strength of a category 4 hurricane but was downgraded to a tropical storm before making landfall on Sunday. It then barreled north through southern California and Nevada dumping historic amounts of rain, causing flash floods, and knocking out power for tens of thousands of people.

Climate scientists have long predicted that rising global temperatures will fuel fiercer tropical storms. Warmer ocean temperatures have given rise to stronger hurricanes and warmer air temperatures, which can hold more water vapor and lead to wetter storms. The climate crisis could also cause storms to intensify more quickly, and a greater proportion of hurricanes in recent decades have reached category 4 or 5 levels.

However, storms of this kind along the US west coast are so rare that there isn’t much research on tropical cyclones in California, and whether the frequency of such storms might increase due to global heating.

California has several natural defenses against hurricanes. Cold ocean temperatures along the state’s coast tend to deflate tropical storms, and its strong east-west winds tend to blow hurricanes away. The downward flow of air across the state also tends to squash down storms.

A confluence of unusual weather patterns in the Pacific this year caused Hilary to break past these defenses. Record high Pacific temperatures helped power the storm, and the combination of a low-pressure area along the west coast and a high-pressure ridge in the central US helped pull it northward, through the United States.

These factors prompted the National Hurricane Center to issue its first-ever tropical storm watch for southern California this weekend, and flood advisories remain in effect across large swaths of southern California and the US southwest.

“Warmer oceans are hurricane fuel,” said University of California, Los Angeles, climate scientist Daniel Swain. And California’s coast generally isn’t warm enough to charge up tropical storms.

“To my knowledge, no one has ever done a formal study on tropical cyclone hazard in a warming climate in California,” Swain said. Because California’s geography is so different from other parts of the world where hurricanes are common, studies from elsewhere don’t provide reliable insight into what is happening now.

While it is plausible that much warmer temperatures in the eastern Pacific could give rise to more such storms, the unique topography and wind conditions in California would still impede them from making landfall there, Swain said. Such storms “will remain a rare event in any foreseeable future”, he said.

“If this were MythBusters I think it might get stamped ‘plausible’ that climate change could increase the likelihood of events like this, but probably not to a very high degree,” he added.

There is a consensus among researchers, however, that the state is likely to see more wet, intense winter storms—as it did this past winter—as well as more frequent heatwaves and more destructive wildfires.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate