Southwest Kicks Another Muslim Off Flight

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/10037058@N08/">Pylon757</a> / Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In what language do sneaky, foreign Islamic terrorists speak to each other? English, of course. That’s what a Southwest Airline crew member must have thought when she flagged 31-year-old graduate student Irum Abbasi as “suspicious” and had her kicked off the plane. Abbasi, a US citizen who was born in Pakistan, was on the phone with Verizon shortly after boarding the the Southwest flight. As is regulation, she had to get off the phone before the airplane could take off. So she told the Verizon agent, “I’ve got to go.”

A Southwest Airline crew member thought the headscarf-clad Abbasi had said, “It’s a go” and suspected there might be a terrorist plot afoot. Why she thought a terrorist who wanted to keep her plans secret would give the “go” signal in English for everyone to hear is a mystery. And I don’t know if the phrase “It’s a go” would have been seen as terrorist lingo if it came from someone who didn’t have an accent or wasn’t obviously Muslim. But regardless, the flight attendant was sufficiently freaked out that the captains of the plane heeded her judgment call and ordered Abbasi taken off the flight. After talking with TSA agents and having her headscarf patted down, Abbasi was cleared to board the next flight. She was later given two apology from the airline and a travel voucher.

“This time they said we weren’t comfortable with the head scarf. Next time, they won’t be comfortable with my accent.”

Abbasi is still upset, however. She wants the Southwest crew member who ordered her detention to be held accountable. And given the circumstances, I can’t say I totally blame her. It seems that the flight attendant was the only one with security concerns about her. “They did not question me. I even handed over my purse and cell phone for inspection and they didn’t even touch it,” Abbasi said. Abbasi, a mother of three, says “This time they said we weren’t comfortable with the head scarf. Next time, they won’t be comfortable with my accent or they won’t be comfortable with my South Asian heritage.” Southwest has said it’s looking into the matter, but hasn’t said if discipline will be in order. 

Southwest spokesperson Chris Mainz said, “”We treat all our customers the same and we think all of our employees do a very good job of that.” People have been kicked off Southwest for having being too thin AND being too fat, so there may be some truth to that. The airline can also be quite hypocritical: they kicked Kyla Ebbert off a flight for dressing too sexy, then painted a bikini-clad model on a plane as part of a Sports Illustrated promo.

Similarly, the airline says it is committed to equality and has hired Muslim pilots, but it also appealed $27.5 million in damages awarded to a woman of Iranian descent who successfully sued the company for racial profiling. In that case, three flight attendants found passenger Samantha Carrington, an economics professor, “suspicious”-looking and claimed she was verbally abusive, physically assaulted a crew member, and threatened to storm the cockpit. As a result of their claims, Carrington had to spend a night in jail. However, Carrington never faced criminal charges because the investigating FBI agent couldn’t find enough truth in the attendants’ story to merit them. Carrington said she had only complained about poor service during the flight, and sued Southwest. During the trial, it came out that one of the attendants had said Carrington “reminded her of a terrorist.” The court ruled in Carrington’s favor, but Southwest appealed and the two parties later settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.

It’s not known what happened to the flight attendants involved, but Carrington (who, like Abbasi, is a US citizen and lives in California) has still not been able to remove her name from terrorist watchlists.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate