Missionaries of Trade

A deceptive ad, using a misleading quote from the Dalai Lama, leads to a murky organization pushing a sketchy agenda.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The Dalai Lama shilling for Apple may offend you, but at least His Holiness agreed to the ad. Not so with a recent ad run by the Alliance for Christian Ministries in China (ACMC). That ad, which ran in the June 9th Washington Post, asked, “What do Billy Graham and the Dalai Lama have in common?” Both, the ad said, believe that we need to maintain open trade with China in order to promote religious freedom there.

“But on one thing they publicly agree: isolating China undermines their shared goal of moving that nation towards freedom and democracy.”

That would be a curious stance for the Dalai Lama to take. After all, he is the exiled leader of a country that has been occupied by China for over 45 years. And he has repeatedly asked the international community to pressure China for more freedom in Tibet.

Well, the Dalai Lama hasn’t endorsed free trade with China, or the ad. In fact his representatives sent a letter to the ACMC complaining that the ACMC misrepresented the Dalai Lama’s views.

“A photo of His Holiness and a quote lifted from a May 11, 1998 New York Times article in which His Holiness speaks out against isolating China is used, without advisement, as an endorsement of a specific pro-trade political position.”

So who is the ACMC, and why are they endorsing free trade with China? Good question, but hard to answer. When the MoJo Wire called the number provided at the bottom of the ad, we didn’t get the Alliance for Christian Ministries in China. Instead we got the DeMoss Group Inc., a PR firm.

It turns out the ACMC is what might be termed a vapor organization. According to James Jewell, a spokesperson for the firm, “The alliance was just formed a couple of months ago, and doesn’t have a staff or an office per se.”

The DeMoss Group was happy to tell us that the ACMC is a coalition of twelve U.S.-based ministries that send missionaries over to China. (Since China doesn’t technically allow missionaries to practice there, they have to work in a profession and just “share their faith.”) When the MoJo Wire asked for the names of the participating ministries, the DeMoss Group would only release a partial list due to “security concerns in China.”

Why is an evangelical group, operated out of a PR firm or not, making free trade with China its most important issue? (So important, in fact, that the headline on its press release reads: “A nation open to trade is a nation open to ministry.”) According to Jewell, “Making sure China stays open to contact, especially trade, is very important to us. Because that’s how we get our people in.”

A valid point. But there could also be another explanation. The DeMoss Group is the PR firm for the Rev. Billy Graham, who in turn has been enlisted by U.S. business groups to help oppose proposed economic sanctions against countries that oppress religous minorities (see “So You Want to Trade With a Dictator,” Mother Jones May/June 1998)—an altogether different kind of mission.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate