Fighting Word

It’s time for the left to reclaim the term ‘anarchy’ — and the philosophy behind it.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


“Anarchism does not mean bloodshed; it does not mean robbery, arson,
etc. These monstrosities are, on the contrary, the characteristic features
of capitalism. Anarchism means peace and tranquility to all.”

— August Spies, Haymarket protester

If you’ve watched the news much in the
past two years, the term “anarchist” probably evokes balaclava-clad ruffians with no political agenda beyond breaking windows, burning police cars, and looting stores. Mention the word and the
world tunes out; violent thugs can’t possibly have a message worth
listening to. The term has been used to paint all activists with the same
brush and to justify violent responses against peaceful and aggressive
protesters alike. The New York Post even called Carlo Giuliani, the protester killed by Italian carabinieri at the G-8 summit in Genoa, an “anarchist berserker” who
“deserved what he got.”

As it happens, it was during another protest, more than 100 years ago, that the word “anarchist” first made headlines. On May 1, 1886, an anarchist group called the Chicago Knights of Labor — whose supporters included Mary Harris “Mother” Jones — staged a peaceful march for an
eight-hour workday. The event led to a days-long general strike involving
thousands of workers; at one rally, police arrived and without
provocation sprayed the crowd with gunfire, killing at least one demonstrator.

Laborers
gathered the next day at the city’s Haymarket Square to protest the violence. As
the police chief shouted at the crowd to disperse, a bomb exploded nearby,
killing one officer. Startled and angry, police shot into the crowd; seven more officers died in the melee, as did four striking workers.

To this day, the identity of the Haymarket bomber is unknown. A number of strike leaders were charged in connection with the crime, and four were ultimately hanged. The campaign to clear their names inspired anarchist movements worldwide, and led to May 1 being declared International Workers Day, a holiday in much of the world.

But the word
“anarchist” never was resuscitated. Writes historian W.T. Whitney, “Unfortunately, the events
surrounding the execution of the Haymarket martyrs fueled the stereotype of radical
activists as alien and violent, thereby contributing to ongoing
repression.”

In fact, the word is derived from the Greek “an”, meaning “without,” and “archos,” meaning “ruler” or “authority. Historically, anarchism has been defined as a
philosophy opposed to hierarchy and exploitive power structures — an idea many lefties could love.

Problem is, the media, a significant portion of the left, and even some academics misuse and misunderstand the term “anarchy.”
The kid in the turtle costume marching peacefully in Seattle, Quebec, or Genoa may be as
much an anarchist as the guy smashing the windows at The Gap. It isn’t violence that makes the anarchist; it’s the philosophy.

“Anarchism emerged out of the socialist movement as a distinct politics
in the nineteenth century,” says the Institute for Anarchist
Studies
, a New York-based nonprofit. “It asserted that it is necessary and possible to overthrow
coercive and exploitative social relationships, and replace them with
egalitarian, self-managed, and cooperative social forms.”

So perhaps there is good reason why the term is so rarely used properly: A nuanced debate about anarchism would lend credence to a set of ideas that challenge the status quo.

“This process of misrepresentation is not without historical parallel,”
argues the Anarchism FAQ, an anarchist overview of the philosophy. “For example, in countries which have
considered government by one person (monarchy) necessary, the words
‘republic’ or ‘democracy’ have been used… to imply
disorder and confusion. Those with a vested interest in preserving the
status quo will obviously wish to imply that opposition to the current
system cannot work in practice, and that a new form of society will only
lead to chaos.”

The Web is full of resources about the
history, meaning, and application of anarchism. In addition to the links above, check out the
Anarchist Archives, the Utne Reader Online’s Anarchism 101, Noam Chomsky’s
thoughts on anarchism, and Britannica.com’s
anarchists on film.

Bits and Pieces

MCVEIGH MURDERED?

Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh’s death certificate lists the manner of his death as
“homicide.” He was executed by lethal injection on June 11.

COLOMBIA: ROUNDUP READY

Perennial biotech bad guy Monsanto is profiting from the drug war in Colombia, according
to CorpWatch. The United States government has sponsored the spraying of
thousands of gallons of the Monsanto herbicide Roundup on coca fields in
Colombia. Local farmers have complained repeatedly of human health
problems, crop failures, and livestock illnesses they suspect are related
to the spraying, but have been rebuffed and ignored by Washington and
Monsanto alike.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate