The Almost Famous Infamous Stringdusters

The Infamous Stringdusters at Outside Lands.Photo: Tim McDonnell

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Chris Pandolfi doesn’t need to focus too much attention on tuning his banjo. We’re talking backstage at the Outside Lands music festival in San Francisco, and as he cleans strings and plucks chords, he never stops the flow of conversation, never gives a glance to the beautiful, well-loved instrument in his lap. The bluegrass licks that subtly interrupt us seem to issue from somewhere else, because to look at Pandolfi’s face you could never tell he was playing them. Perhaps that’s because Pandolfi is a thirteen-year veteran of his instrument, but it’s also probably because tuning up for big festival shows has become increasingly de rigeur for him in recent years.

Pandolfi makes up one-sixth of the rollicking bluegrass ensemble The Infamous Stringdusters, a group that has been on a steady uphill climb since being named 2007’s Emerging Artist of the Year by the International Bluegrass Music Association (their first album, Fork in the Road, also snagged top honors that year for best song and album). This summer, the band has done its time on the festival circuit, playing in Telluride, Grand Targhee, and most recently, performing with established rock stars of the Yonder Mountain String Band at Red Rocks. You might think a rise to the top would distract the band from its musical foundations, but as far as Pandolfi is concerned, nothing could be less true.

“You get experience on the job you can’t get any other way,” he said. “And it’s real, it’s easy, it’s all going in the direction of saying, ‘This is who we really are.’ We want to arrive on that big stage doing what we do most naturally.”

Fortunately for us in the audience, what the Infamous Stringdusters do most naturally is put on a virtuosic performance grounded in what Pandolfi calls “the Nashville pedigree,” but loaded with a healthy dose of rock and jazz fusion. Most of the songs had lyrics, but they served mainly as punctuation marks between fearless solos by former Dolly Parton sideman Andy Hall on the dobro, Andy Falco on acoustic guitar, and the rest of the finger-pickin’, fiddle-sawin’ crew.

What could have been a small show became a foot-stomping hootenanny, complete with an enormous, prodigiously hairy man wearing nothing but a pair of dirty overalls who looked like he’d walked to Golden Gate Park straight from the Appalachians.

The result is a progressive take on bluegrass that sets the Stringdusters apart from their contemporaries, and the audience at Outside Lands was all ears. Even at the end of the festival’s third day, folks found the energy to turn what could have been a small show into a foot-stomping hootenanny, complete with an enormous, prodigiously hairy man wearing nothing but a pair of dirty overalls who looked like he’d walked to Golden Gate Park straight from the Appalachians. “We have a link to the original bluegrass,” Pandolfi said. “Now our job as artists is to evolve that in whatever way. Some people want to just be a throwback, the art of imitation, the art of preservation, but honestly the music that inspired us originally just has nothing to do with that.”

Pandolfi first picked up banjo at the age of 18 after listening to Bela Fleck and the Flecktones, and came to bluegrass music through his study of the instrument. Though the only bluegrass album he listens to regularly is Jerry Garcia and mandolinist David Grisman’s classic collaboration Shady Grove, he’s drawn to the genre’s organic, raw sound that “other types of music just don’t have.”

“It’s a natural thing, it’s metal and wood, and there’s something cool about that,” he said.

At an International Bluegrass Music Association meetup five years ago, Pandolfi found a group of fellow musicians who felt the same way, and the Stringdusters were born. Since then, he said, the band’s primary goal has been to share their music with as many people as possible, and to keep pushing the size of the stages they play. And while that’s sometimes been an exercise in patience, there’s no sign the band plans to take the tempo down anytime soon: “When you’re a band you can see the next year and then you can sorta dream over the next five years, but anything beyond that is really hard to predict, because in this business what we’re all shooting for is that quick ride, you know, some real notoriety.”

Click here for more music features from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate