Chris Christie: No. No. No. No. No?

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bobjagendorf/5492860578/">Bob Jagendorf</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Earlier this year, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie told reporters that “short of suicide, I don’t really know what I’d have to do to convince you people that I’m not running” for president. Today, according to that trusted source, Fox News, he still isn’t running. But between all the colorful denials, Christie has been quietly (and repeatedly) meeting with wealthy Republican donors, including—as Mother Jones recently revealed—the notorious Koch brothers.

For months, Christie has been under “huge pressure from high-ranking Republicans and fund-raisers,” as one anonymous source recently put it, who are unhappy with the prospect of choosing between Rick Perry and Mitt Romney. These players include hedge-fund exec Paul Singer, who has given more than $1 million to the “Kochtopus,” and Home Depot cofounder Ken Langone, who organized a July Manhattan meeting of “40-50 Republican heavy-hitters” to persuade Christie to run. Both social moderates who support gay marriage, Singer and Langone are apparently drawn to Christie’s prioritizing of union-bashing, budget-slashing economic issues over moral-values plays.

On Friday, the conservative media outlet Newsmax reported, without naming names, that the Draft Christie movement “culminated in a hush-hush powwow held in the past week with Christie and several notable Republican billionaires.” A source in the know told Newsmax that “Christie seemed inclined to enter the race.”

Last Thursday, Christie and Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels spoke to students at Rider University in New Jersey, where Christie again denied that he would run. He acknowledged the concerns with the current Republican field. “I think what the country is thirsting for, more than anything else right now, is someone of stature and credibility to tell them that and say, ‘Here’s where I want us to go to deal with this crisis,” he said. “The fact that nobody yet who’s running for president, in my view, has done that effectively is why you continue to hear people ask Daniels if he’ll reconsider and ask me if I’ll reconsider.”

Then Daniels said what Christie may have been implying: “I’m not taking ‘no’ from Christie. “I’m taking ‘not yet.'”

Some Republican heavyweights, worried about Rick Perry’s electability and the lack of enthusiasm among the base for Mitt Romney, may keep piling on in the hope that “not yet” doesn’t have to mean “not in 2012.” In their view, Christie—who believes in global warming and has derided the anti-Sharia crowd as “crazies,” but is unafraid to aggressively pursue a conservative fiscal agenda—could be an acceptable bridge between tea partiers and GOP moderates.

Langone, in fact, has advocated raising taxes on the rich; several of the donors at his July meeting said they voted for President Obama in 2008 because they didn’t want Sarah Palin on the GOP ticket. And Singer supported Rudy Giuliani in 2008. But Christie’s supporters aren’t all conservative outliers. The Koch brothers have reportedly pushed Christie to reconsider a presidential bid. So has Charles Schwab, another member of the Kochs’ million-dollar donor club, whose brokerage firm has donated millions to Republicans. Last year, in the hope of convincing Christie to run, Fox News CEO Roger Ailes wine-and-dined him alongside Rush Limbaugh.

Politico reported last week that a “former RNC chair said many in GOP finance circles simply won’t take no for an answer.” The chair in question said that “a group of donors, particularly New York guys” were “pushing Christie really hard,” adding that, “Singer won’t give up.”

Christie, it seems, may have to resort to suicide after all.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate