Top 100 Corporate Criminals of the 1990s

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The criminal element has seeped deep into every nook and cranny of American society.

Forget about the underworld — these crooks dominate every aspect of our market, culture, and politics.

They cast a deep dark shadow over life in turn of the century America.

We buy gas from them (Exxon, Chevron, Unocal).

We take pictures with their cameras and film (Eastman Kodak).

We drink their beer (Coors).

We buy insurance from them to guard against financial catastrophe if we get sick (Blue Cross Blue Shield).

And then when we get sick, we buy pharmaceuticals from them (Pfizer, Warner Lambert, Ortho Pharmaceuticals).

We do our laundry washers and dryers from them (General Electric).

We vacation with them (Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines).

We buy our food from them (Archer Daniels Midland, Southland, Tyson Foods, U.S. Sugar).

We drive with them (Hyundai) and fly with them (Korean Air Lines).

All of these companies and more turned up on Corporate Crime Reporter’s list of the Top 100 Corporate Criminals of the 1990s, released this past week at a news conference at the National Press Club.

Standing before a roomful of reporters and cameras (including a C-Span camera which took us live to our TV nation), we made the following points:

Every year, the major business magazines put out their annual surveys of big business in America.

You have the Fortune 500, the Forbes 400, the Forbes Platinum 100, the International 800 — among others.

These lists rank big corporations by sales, assets, profits and market share. The point of these surveys is simple — to identify and glorify the biggest and most profitable corporations.

The point of releasing The Top 100 Corporate Criminals of the Decade, on the other hand, was to focus public attention on the pervasive criminality that has corrupted the marketplace and that is given little sustained attention and analysis by politicians and news outlets.

To compile The Top 100 Corporate Criminals of the 1990s, we used the most narrow and conservative of definitions — corporations that have pled guilty or no contest to crimes and have been criminally fined. And still, with the most narrow and conservative of definitions of corporate crime, we came up with society’s most powerful actors.

Six corporations that made the list of the Top 100 Corporate Criminals were criminal recidivist companies during the 1990s.

Exxon, Royal Caribbean, Rockwell International, Warner-Lambert, Teledyne, and United Technologies each pled guilty to more than one crime during the 1990s.

And we warned that we in no way imply that these corporations are in any way the worst or have committed the most egregious crimes.

We did not try to assess and compare the damage committed by these corporate criminals or by other corporate wrongdoers.

We warned that companies that are criminally prosecuted represent only the tip of a very large iceberg of corporate wrongdoing.

For every company convicted of health care fraud, there are hundreds of others who get away with ripping off Medicare and Medicaid, or face only mild slap-on-the-wrist fines and civil penalties when caught.

For every company convicted of polluting the nation’s waterways, there are many others who are not prosecuted because their corporate defense lawyers are able to offer up a low-level employee to go to jail in exchange for a promise from prosecutors not to touch the company or high-level executives.

For every corporation convicted of bribery or of giving money directly to a public official in violation of federal law, there are thousands who give money legally through political action committees to candidates and political parties. They profit from a system that effectively has legalized bribery.

For every corporation convicted of selling illegal pesticides, there are hundreds more who are not prosecuted because their lobbyists have worked their way in Washington to ensure that dangerous pesticides remain legal.

For every corporation convicted of reckless homicide in the death of a worker, there are hundreds of others that don’t even get investigated for reckless homicide when a worker is killed on the job. Only a few district attorneys across the country (Michael McCann, the DA in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, being one) regularly investigate workplace deaths as homicides.

We pointed out that corporations define the laws under which they live.

An argument can be made that the most egregious wrongful corporate acts — the genetic engineering of the food supply, or the systematic pollution of the nation’s air and waterways, or the bribery by corporate criminals of the political parties — are totally legal.

For your convenience, we print here the list of 100 crooks that fall well within a very conservative definition of criminality.

Carry this list wherever you go, and when the subject turns to crime, feel free to pull out the list and lash the criminal element.

THE TOP 100 CORPORATE CRIMINALS OF THE 1990s

1) F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $500 million

2) Daiwa Bank Ltd.
Type of Crime: Financial
Criminal Fine: $340 million

3) BASF Aktiengesellschaft
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $225 million

4) SGL Carbon Aktiengesellschaft (SGL AG)
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $135 million

5) Exxon Corporation and Exxon Shipping
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $125 million

6) UCAR International, Inc.
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $110 million

7) Archer Daniels Midland
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $100 million

8)(tie) Banker’s Trust
Type of Crime: Financial
Criminal Fine: $60 million

8)(tie) Sears Bankruptcy Recovery Management Services
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $60 million

10) Haarman & Reimer Corp.
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal fine: $50 million

11) Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $37 million

12) Hoechst AG
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $36 million

13) Damon Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $35.2 million

14) C.R. Bard Inc.
Type of Crime: Food and drug
Criminal Fine: $30.9 million
7 Corporate Crime Reporter 41(1), October 25, 1993

15) Genentech Inc.
Type of Crime: Food and drug
Criminal Fine: $30 million

16) Nippon Gohsei
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $21 million

17)(tie) Pfizer Inc.
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $20 million

17)(tie) Summitville Consolidated Mining Co. Inc.
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $20 million
10 Corporate Crime Reporter 20(3) May 20, 1996

19)(tie) Lucas Western Inc.
Type of Crime: False Statements
Criminal Fine: $18.5 million
9 Corporate Crime Reporter 4(6), January 30, 1995

19)(tie) Rockwell International Corporation
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $18.5 million

21) Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $18 million

22) Teledyne Industries Inc.
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $17.5 million

23) Northrop
Type of Crime: False statements
Criminal Fine: $17 million

24) Litton Applied Technology Division (ATD) and Litton Systems Canada (LSL)
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $16.5 million

25) Iroquois Pipeline Operating Company
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $15 million

26) Eastman Chemical Company
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $11 million

27) Copley Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Type of Crime: Food and drug
Criminal Fine: $10.65 million

28) Lonza AG
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $10.5 million

29) Kimberly Home Health Care Inc.
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $10.08 million

30)(tie) Ajinomoto Co. Inc.
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $10 million

30)(tie) Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI)
Type of Crime: Financial
Criminal Fine: $10 million

30)(tie) Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co. Ltd.
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $10 million

30)(tie) Warner-Lambert Company
Type of Crime: Food and drug
Criminal Fine: $10 million

34) General Electric
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $9.5 million

35)(tie) Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $9 million

35)(tie) Showa Denko Carbon
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $9 million

37) IBM East Europe/Asia Ltd.
Type of Crime: Illegal exports
Criminal Fine: $8.5 million

38) Empire Sanitary Landfill Inc.
Type of crime: Campaign finance
Criminal fine: $8 million

39)(tie) Colonial Pipeline Company
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $7 million

39)(tie) Eklof Marine Corporation
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $7 million

41)(tie) Chevron
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $6.5 million

41)(tie) Rockwell International Corporation
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $6.5 million

43) Tokai Carbon Ltd. Co.
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $6 million

44)(tie) Allied Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $5 million

44)(tie) Northern Brands International Inc.
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $5 million

44)(tie) Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation
Type of Crime: Obstruction of justice
Criminal Fine: $5 million

44)(tie) Unisys
Type of Crime: Bribery
Criminal Fine: $5 million

44)(tie) Georgia Pacific Corporation
Type of Crime: Tax evasion
Criminal Fine: $5 million
5 Corporate Crime Reporter 38(8), October 7, 1991

49) Kanzaki Specialty Papers Inc.
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $4.5 million

50) ConAgra Inc.
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $4.4 million

51) Ryland Mortgage Company
Type of Crime: Financial
Criminal Fine: $4.2 million

52)(tie) Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $4 million

52)(tie) Borden Inc.
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $4 million

52)(tie) Dexter Corporation
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $4 million

52)(tie) Southland Corporation
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $4 million

52)(tie) Teledyne Industries Inc.
Type of Crime: Illegal exports
Criminal Fine: $4 million

52)(tie) Tyson Foods Inc.
Type of Crime: Public corruption
Criminal Fine: $4 million

58)(tie) Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA)
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $3.75 million

58)(tie) Costain Coal Inc.
Type of Crime: Worker Death
Criminal Fine: $3.75 million

58)(tie) United States Sugar Corporation
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $3.75 million

61) Saybolt, Inc., Saybolt North America
Type of Crime: Environmental, bribery
Criminal Fine: $3.4 million

62)(tie) Bristol-Myers Squibb
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $3 million

62)(tie) Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $3 million

62)(tie) Ketchikan Pulp Company
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $3 million

62)(tie) United Technologies Corporation
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $3 million

62)(tie) Warner-Lambert Inc.
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $3 million

67)(tie) Arizona Chemical Co. Inc.
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $2.5 million

67)(tie) Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail)
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $2.5 million

69) International Paper
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $2.2 million

70)(tie) Consolidated Edison Company
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $2 million

70)(tie) Crop Growers Corporation
Type of Crime: Campaign finance
Criminal fine: $2 million

70)(tie) E-Systems Inc.
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $2 million

70)(tie) HAL Beheer BV
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $2 million

70)(tie) John Morrell and Company
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $2 million

70)(tie) United Technologies Corporation
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $2 million

76) Mitsubishi Corporation, Mitsubishi International Corporation
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $1.8 million

77)(tie) Blue Shield of California
Type of Crime: Fraud
Criminal Fine: $1.5 million

77)(tie) Browning-Ferris Inc.
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $1.5 million

77)(tie) Odwalla Inc.
Type of Crime: Food and drug
Criminal Fine: $1.5 million

77)(tie) Teledyne Inc.
Type of Crime: False statements
Criminal Fine: $1.5 million

77)(tie) Unocal Corporation
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $1.5 million

82)(tie) Doyon Drilling Inc.
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $1 million

82)(tie) Eastman Kodak
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $1 million

82)(tie) Case Corporation
Type of Crime: Illegal exports
Criminal Fine: $1 million

85) Marathon Oil
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $900,000

86) Hyundai Motor Company
Type of Crime: Campaign finance
Criminal Fine: $600,000

87)(tie) Baxter International Inc.
Type of Crime: Illegal Boycott
Criminal Fine: $500,000

87)(tie) Bethship-Sabine Yard
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $500,000

87(tie) Palm Beach Cruises
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $500,000

87)(tie) Princess Cruises Inc.
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $500,000

91)(tie) Cerestar Bioproducts BV
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $400,000

91)(tie) Sun-Land Products of California
Type of Crime: Campaign finance
Criminal Fine: $400,000

93)(tie) American Cyanamid
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $250,000

93)(tie) Korean Air Lines
Type of Crime: Campaign finance
Criminal Fine: $250,000

93)(tie) Regency Cruises Inc.
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $250,000

96)(tie) Adolph Coors Company
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $200,000

96)(tie) Andrew and Williamson Sales Co.
Type of crime: Food and drug
Criminal fine: $200,000

96)(tie) Daewoo International (America) Corporation
Type of Fine: Campaign finance
Criminal Fine: $200,000

96)(tie) Exxon Corporation
Type of Crime: Environmental
Criminal Fine: $200,000

100) Samsung America Inc.
Type of Crime: Campaign finance
Criminal Fine: $150,000

Russell Mokhiber is the editor of the Corporate Crime Reporter and Robert Weissman is the editor ofMultinational Monitor. Their column appears weekly on the MoJo Wire.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate