Study: Obama Got Most Late-Night Talk Show Jabs in 2011

Screenshot: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8XpwpF6CkA&feature=relmfu">YouTube</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Barack Obama got it hardest from late-night talk show hosts in 2011. According to a study published by George Mason University’s Center for Media and Public Affairs, the president was the No. 1 target of the three leading late-night comics—Jay Leno, David Letterman, Jimmy Fallon—in politically-themed segments and opening monologues, accounting for a grand total of 342 jokes made at Obama’s expense.

Here’s a decent example:

A similar study was conducted by the CMPA in 2010, which found that, between January 2 and Labor Day, “President Barack Obama [topped] the joke tally with 309, over twice as many as the two prominent Republican politicians who follow him—Sarah Palin with 137 jokes and George W. Bush with 132.”

Just for a frame of reference, the runner-up for the title of 2011’s top writers-room victim was former congressman Anthony Weiner, who found himself on the butt end of 220 jokes. (To be fair, though, it’s not like Weinergate was in the news for all of 2011.) Also, Obama took the Tonight Show-Late Show-Late Night guff more often than Moammar Qaddafi, Newt Gingrich, and Mitt Romney combined (121, 110, and 79, respectively). Here are the top 20:

1. Barack Obama – 342

2. Anthony Weiner – 220

3. Herman Cain – 191

4. Rick Perry – 186

5. Osama bin Laden – 172

6. Arnold Schwarzenegger – 142

7. Michele Bachmann – 128

8. Donald Trump – 122

9. Moammar Qaddafi – 121

10. Newt Gingrich – 110

11. Sarah Palin – 109

12. Joe Biden – 82

13. Mitt Romney – 79

14. Chris Christie – 71

15. John Boehner – 69

16. Dick Cheney – 66

17. George W. Bush – 36

18. Rupert Murdoch – 30

19. Rod Blagojevich – 24

20. Michael Bloomberg and Hosni Mubarek – 22

It’s not all bad news for the president: The study does show that the talk show hosts took swipes at Republicans nearly three times as often as they lampooned Democrats. Furthermore, Obama’s tally is well below that of presidents Bill Clinton or George W. Bush, both of whom maintained yearly averages of 500+ talk show swipes while in office.

So really, numbers like this are to be expected. The president is clearly the most visible of any of the figures on the list, and it’s generally easier to deliver stand-up on American politicos than it is to make light of headlines regarding mass murderers like Qaddafi or Bin Laden. (As the Center noted, “[t]he President of the United States usually leads the list of joke targets by virtue of making news so often.”) But will these numbers help to debunk the silly notion on the right that the media and entertainment world is in the business of “protecting” Barack Obama?

Honestly, I wouldn’t hold your breath.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate