The Bush Files

A sampling of the day’s best independent news, views, and resources on US politics, keeping an eye on the Bush Administration. Updated each weekday.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Feb. 23, 2001

Furor over columnist’s Chelsea rant — Online Journal
Conservative columnist John Derbyshire is under fire for a column he wrote Feb. 15 in which he pilloried Chelsea Clinton, and made reference to Stalinist and Nazi practices of exterminating the families of “despots” and “enemies of the people.” Critics say Derbyshire (who is unrepentant) should be investigated by the Secret Service for making what they call veiled threats on Chelsea’s life. (Thanks to BuzzFlash for the tip.)

Armey accuses NAACP of ‘reverse race-baiting’ — Associated Press
House Majority Leader Dick Armey has written a letter to Kweisi Mfume, head of the NAACP, saying Mfume’s organization tries to politically harm Republicans by labelling them racists. “I believe there is a phenomenon in American politics today that could justly be called ‘racial McCarthyism’ or ‘reverse race-baiting,'” Armey wrote.

 

Feb. 22, 2001

Bush Sr.’s controversial 1993 pardon — Various
George H. W. Bush commuted the sentence of a Pakastani heroin smuggler — who had been serving a 55-year sentence in South Carolina — just before the end of Bush’s presidential term in 1993. (Rep. Henry Waxman of California referred to the little-known pardon during his testimony Feb. 8, 2001 before the House Government Reform Committee, which is investigating Clinton’s pardon of Marc Rich.) Bush only pardoned two other federal prisoners during his term, and his administration never explained the rationale behind the unusual last-minute offer of clemency, but some critics say the smuggler may have had secret ties to the DEA or CIA. (Thanks to Henrietta and Rick Cummings for the tip.)

Faith-based for your comfort — San Francisco Chronicle
Columnist Jon Carroll says: “We now have a faith-based presidency. We need to have faith that we have a president. We have a person in the White House who is called the president, but it is hard to imagine him doing the job. Faith is the evidence of things not seen. We do not see him working, and yet we believe he is. We do not see him thinking, yet we believe he is.”

Pat Robertson says faith-based initiative encourages cults — San Francisco Chronicle
One of the unanticipated results of Bush’s faith-based initiative could be renewed intolerance between religious groups who will now be competing for federal funds. Pat Roberston, for one, is concerned that some religions he doesn’t subscribe to — such as Scientology, Bush supporter Sun Myung Moon’s Unification Church, and the Hare Krishnas — will have equal access to public funds. One can’t help but foresee a “WWJD Smackdown” on cable in the future.

Marc Rich calls off party for himself — Blick (via Yahoo)
The German paper Blick reports that billionaire luck-out Marc Rich has decided that throwing himself a huge party to celebrate his controversial pardon might be a little much. So he has cancelled the festivities, which had been planned for this Friday at the swank St. Moritz ski resort in Switzerland. Rich had themed the fete “A Night in Las Vegas.”

Clinton’s NYT rough draft — Modern Humorist
You almost don’t have to spoof Clinton’s stumbling over his controversial pardons. His New York Times op-ed Sunday — and the corrections which followed it — have provided plenty of groans. But leave it to the cut-ups at Modern Humorist to take the absurdity to the next level, with this fictional “first draft” of Bill’s Times piece.

 

Feb. 21, 2001

Nancy Reagan disses Dubya — New York Post
The cuddly Mrs. Reagan calls George W. “the village idiot,” according to gossip doyenne Cindy Adams. Finally, the woman once dubbed “The Dragon Lady” by her husband’s staff and the Dems have something they can agree on!

Lynne Cheney apes Tipper — Associated Press
Lynne Cheney has made the risky, original move of coming out against shock rapper Eminem. Sounds an awful lot like another vice president’s wife we all know and sort of miss but not really.

How much will the Bush tax cut save you? — Quicken
Your friendly neighborhood Bush Files editor discovered, using Quicken’s handy Tax Estimator, that her share of Bush’s $1.6 billion tax cut is a whopping $496. Almost enough to make her register Republican. Not.

 

Feb. 20, 2001

Bush a moderate? Puhleeze — Los Angeles Times
The appointment of Ted Olson as solicitor general — a traditional staging area for prospective Supreme Court justices — shows how dedicated Bush is to forcing his right-wing agenda, despite his protestations that he is a moderate, says Robert Scheer. “It may be legal, but it’s still a coup d’etat,” Scheer says.


The two faces of George — The Guardian (UK)

“George Bush completes his first month in office today, having pulled off the seemingly impossible – cloaking his lack of a mandate under the banner of bipartisanship while pursuing the most radically conservative agenda since the Reagan era.” Also: The Guardian rates the Bush administration’s “bipartisanship” in the first month. Guess what? Dubya fails miserably.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate