The Thrilling Musical Machine of Micachu and the Shapes

<a href="http://www.roughtraderecords.com/micachu">Courtesy Rough Trade</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The album Never begins with a clamor. Discordant, metallic beats clang on a loop before Mica Levi’s ghoulish vocals sweep in. “Just leave the rest for me/Just leave the rest for me,” she pleads. A wind-down, and then a bluesy refrain: “I’m easy to please/I’m easy to plea…” But before I can anticipate a proper verse-chorus, someone’s flipped the switch. Bashing ensues, as does synthetic screeching. White noise streams on high while something rolls, crunching over broken glass. There’s the suck of a vacuum cleaner, a manic crescendo, a halt.

In 1913, 27-year-old Italian futurist Luigi Russolo expressed his boredom with the state of music.* In a world made newly complex by industry and the roar of machines, accepted “musical sound,” Russolo wrote in a letter to his friend Francesco Balillo Pratella, “has become to our ears what a too familiar face is to our eyes.”

“Noise, on the other hand,” he argued, “comes to us confused and irregular as life itself.”

British trio Micachu and the Shapes’ second album, Never, fully embraces noise for all of its shock and harshness. Much of it has to do with frontwoman Mica Levi’s affinity for vacuum cleaners and homemade instruments, like her chu (a guitar she adapted to be hit with a stick), or the xylophone she constructed out of lightbulbs. A classically trained musician (as well as the youngest person to become an artist-in-residence at London’s prestigious Southbank Centre), Levi spent her early years making grimy beats and mixtapes with local London rappers, another influence that’s clearly stamped itself on the latest Shapes release. While the group’s first album, Jewellery, also toyed with abrasiveness, Never breaks away from the cuteness and quirk of those songs. “What matters is whether you’re genuinely excited by it,” Levi told the Guardian about the Shapes’ use of unconventional sound earlier this month. “The braver you are, the more careless you are with it, the better it is.”

On Never, the result is a set of songs that stomp, spook, and swagger with mechanical force. And yet, the Shapes honor the pop within—much of Levi’s melodies sound like they could have been ripped from an unmade Kinks album, or from what John Lennon might’ve hummed to himself while brainstorming Revolver. “Are you sure you’re okay? Couldn’t be better,” Levi sings on “OK,” a jangly, psychedelic jaunt over sludgy synth and what sounds like clashing swords. “Holiday” too, is at its heart pure doo-wop, though doo-wop pulled apart, put back together, and reanimated with squealing tape that resembles a sitar. On the album’s most straightforward track, “Top Floor,” Levi sings a short, dreamy melody about wanting “to jump into the white sky,” while accompanied by chirping birds.

Even so, Never lands like a flying saucer onto pop terrain. It’s both jarring and magical, and indeed, one sentiment seems to inform the other. Hopefully, the Shapes only continue to push boundaries in this direction. Fellow noise artists Animal Collective will be touring with the trio across the US this fall, where American audiences will get to experience the latest roar from the Shapes’ visionary musical machine.

Correction: This article originally stated that Luigi Russolo was 19 years-old in 1913. In fact, he was 27. The text has been corrected.

Click here for more Music Monday features from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate