ALEC’s Own US Senator?

GOP veteran Tommy Thompson, now running for Senate, has deep ties to the powerful group behind “Stand Your Ground” and voter ID laws.

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/whereisyourmind/400348737/">whereisyourmind</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Before his 14-year stint as governor, before President George W. Bush tapped him to run the Department of Health and Human Services, and before his cushy gig as a wining-and-dining Washington lobbyist, Republican Tommy Thompson began carving out a reputation as powerful state legislator in Wisconsin. He rose quickly through the ranks of the Wisconsin GOP, and went on to become the longest-serving governor in state history. On his way to the top, Thompson found help in an influential policy organization then little known to the public: the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC.

Thompson is now back in the spotlight as the Republican nominee in Wisconsin’s US Senate race. By now “Tommy” is a household name in the state, but less understood is Thompson’s relationship with ALEC throughout his career and his role in shaping ALEC’s agenda. As Thompson once admitted about his early days in the Wisconsin Legislature, “I always loved going to [ALEC] meetings because I always found new ideas. Then I’d take them back to Wisconsin, disguise them a little bit, and declare that it’s mine.” (A Thompson spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.)

Thompson professed his love for ALEC back in 2002. Today, the national organization is a lightning rod in American politics. A fierce advocate of free markets, privatization, and downsizing government, ALEC brings together dues-paying corporations and thousands of state lawmakers, most of them Republicans, to craft “model legislation” for use in state legislatures. Critics slam as ALEC a pro-business “bill mill” and a speed-dating service for big business and state lawmakers looking for ideas to take back home.

This year, ALEC has faced an onslaught of criticism from liberal groups for peddling “discriminatory” voter ID bills and the “Stand Your Ground” gun legislation brought to national attention by the Trayvon Martin killing in central Florida. Facing pressure from ALEC’s well-organized critics, four nonprofit groups and 32 corporations, among them McDonald’s, Procter and Gamble, and Walmart, announced plans to sever ties with ALEC. And in April, the good-government group Common Cause filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service alleging ALEC violates its tax-exempt status by lobbying state governments.

ALEC attorney Alan Dye called Common Cause’s allegations “patently false.” However, the group has acknowledged that the attacks are the fiercest against it in the organization’s history.

“ALEC’s welfare plan was hugely influenced by the reforms Thompson was making in Wisconsin,” says a former leader of the organization.

Created in 1973 by conservative activist Paul Weyrich, Illinois state Rep. Henry Hyde, and former Reagan aide Lou Barnett, ALEC lists Thompson on its website as one of a handful of Republicans who shaped ALEC “in its formative years.” Thompson was an early member of ALEC in the 1970s, and in 1991 he received the organization’s Jefferson Freedom Award, given annually to a lawmaker who “advances the fundamental Jeffersonian principles of free markets, limited government, federalism, and individual liberty.” Thompson was the organization’s second Jefferson award winner, preceded only by Ronald Reagan.

Three of Thompson’s signature legislative changes as Wisconsin governor bear ALEC’s fingerprints. In 1998, Thompson signed so-called Truth-in-Sentencing legislation into law. The measure—which 25 other states had passed in 1995 with ALEC’s help—increased maximum sentences for felons and eliminated parole. Wisconsin’s own version of the bill mirrored legislation written by ALEC. Then-Assemblyman Scott Walker (now governor) said that ALEC’s statistics on the benefits of the bill “were very helpful” to passing the bill.

Truth-in-sentencing legislation originated out of ALEC’s Criminal Justice Task Force, members of which included private prison companies such as the massive Corrections Corporation of America. It came as no surprise that Wisconsin’s law soon drove up corrections spending: Over the course of Thompson’s tenure, corrections spending ballooned from $179 million in 1990 to nearly $850 million in 2001—a windfall for companies like CCA. A 2010 report by the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance noted that, between 1993 and 1999, Wisconsin imprisoned six times as many people as neighboring Minnesota, despite the two states having strikingly similar populations and demographics.

Also under Thompson, Wisconsin became the first state in the nation to adopt a “school choice” program, an ALEC-backed education reform policy. In 1990, Milwaukee moved to a voucher program for low-income students; ALEC and the free-market Bradley Foundation in Milwaukee strongly supported such policy, and Milwaukee’s program borrowed from ALEC’s model legislation.  According to Mary Bottari, an ALEC expert and critic, it was the “camel’s nose under the tent for a long-term agenda, with the ultimate goal of privatization of public schools.”

Most of all, Thompson made a name for himself with his overhaul of Wisconsin’s social-welfare system. Thompson replaced the state’s existing system with “Wisconsin Works,” which forced welfare recipients to find work to collect benefits and capped the amount of time recipients could be on welfare.

Here, the familiar ALEC script got flipped: Thompson didn’t take his cues from ALEC; instead the organization modeled its welfare agenda after Thompson’s, according to former members. “ALEC’s welfare plan was hugely influenced by the reforms Thompson was making in Wisconsin,” says Ray Haynes, a former California state lawmaker who was ALEC’s national chair in 2000 and sat on its board from 1994 to 2006.

Thompson and ALEC didn’t always see eye-to-eye, however. For years, Thompson, who once chaired Amtrak’s board, supported high-speed rail construction; as governor he proposed a 110-mph rail route from Milwaukee to Madison, the state capital. But ALEC has long opposed government-funded high-speed rail projects. (Thompson has since backtracked somewhat on his rail support.) ALEC also ripped Wisconsin in a 1999 report for being “one of the nation’s most profligate” states, giving the state a D grade for its fiscal policy.

No matter: Thompson got the celebrity treatment at ALEC conferences, where his speeches were marquee events. “For a lot of conservative legislators across the country, Thompson had rock star status,” Haynes recalls. “When Tommy Thompson showed up at an ALEC conference, people made sure to hear him speak. He was the leading light on welfare reform in the ’90s.”

Indeed, ALEC might not be the organization it is today without Thompson’s involvement and inspiration. In 1996, Paul Weyrich, who cofounded ALEC and was an architect of the New Right conservative movement, was asked by a magazine to list his political heroes. His answer: Jesse Helms, Margaret Thatcher, and the man now aiming to be Wisconsin’s next Republican senator.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate