Q&A: Mercury Rev

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-mercuryrev.jpgWhat do you do if you’re making experimental films in Buffalo and you need a cool soundtrack? Well, you grab some friends and start making music, and eventually you become Mercury Rev, a band whose combination of psychedelic experimentation and melodic purity have made them longtime critical favorites. While the combo has had a famously rotating lineup, the current core group of singer Jonathan Donahue, guitarist Sean “Grasshopper” Mackowiak and drummer/keyboardist Jeff Mercel has been intact since 1998’s Deserter’s Songs. The band released two albums in September: Snowflake Midnight and a free-to-download bonus album of instrumentals called Strange Attractor. They’re currently in the midst of a US tour, and I managed to catch Mercel on the phone before a sound check in Chicago.

Okay, nothing against Buffalo, but I’m just wondering, is there a connection between adventurous American bands and really boring towns? I’m thinking of Flaming Lips in Norman Oklahoma, and maybe Grandaddy in Modesto. Is this all about being forced to come up with your own entertainment?

[Laughs] Well I guess you make your own fun. I think that could well be part of it. Also, when you come from a smaller city there isn’t that sort of “scene,” there isn’t that school like there is say in New York, or Seattle in the 90s. Maybe it’s good to come out of that setting, as opposed to being one of many bands. You really develop your own character, your own sound, your own thing, because it’s not that you’re working in a vacuum, but you’re working in a different setting. Even now, where we live in the Catskills, it’s a much more laid back sort of place, there isn’t the constant pressure or comparison to other bands. I find it much easier to do your own thing without worrying about what the current trend is. That being said, I spend half my time in Brooklyn as well and I haven’t noticed any negative effects.

Well, one way I think the small-town or country lifestyle does have an influence is that while some people say you’re the “psychedelic freakout” band, I think you’re often making very pure, delicate, spacious and lovely music. I’m thinking tracks like “Endlessly” or “Opus 40,” those could be in a Disney movie. I mean that in the best possible way. Am I crazy?

It’s a valid point. It’s representative of the fact that our influences are fairly diverse, and there’s as much room for George Gershwin as there is for Sonic Youth in our palette, if you will. And often times it’s the deliberate play of those two elements, serene beauty versus extreme bombast, within 30 seconds in the same piece of music, that we find intriguing. That’s something we definitely worked with on Snowflake Midnight, the unpredictability of that, where we were assembling songs by cutting up different pieces of music that we’d been working on, and deliberately working at these strange and sometimes uncomfortable juxtapositions. So you’ve got that very pastoral thing that you’ll find in some songs, paired with a very aggressive, or bombastic, or chaotic element. We enjoy both and we acknowledge that both do exist simultaneously whether it’s in music or in life in general.

Too true. The new album also focuses a little bit more on electronic sounds, and honestly kind of reminds me of the KLF or the Orb. You worked with the Chemical Brothers a few years back as well, so was there any specific inspiration for this new direction?

It wasn’t like we went out and bought a whole bunch of records and said “well we want to sound like this or that.” It was something quite simple: we moved our studio a couple times in the process of making this record and ended up in a very small room, and we purged a bunch of our gear. We were left with a different palette of tools, and I think that started the chain reaction that led to the sound you hear. At the same time, we were also conscious that we did want to make a record that we felt was different for us. You pull away your safety blanket sometimes, you knock out the underpinnings that you typically have. That led to the more electronic nature of this record. We were conscious of not using some of the tools we’d used in the past. Grasshopper didn’t pick up a guitar, I deliberately didn’t get behind a drum kit for many many months.

A lot of us critic-types are currently obsessed with best-of lists, and Snowflake Midnight has ended up on quite a few of those lists this year. Any albums that you or the band have as favorites from 2008?

I am definitely a fan of the Fleet Foxes record, I thought that was a real breath of fresh air, it’s a gorgeous record. A pure fun side of me also loves the MGMT record. I was actually looking on Mother Jones earlier today and saw your thing about the polls, and everybody’s talking about the TV on the Radio album which I haven’t heard yet, so I have to do some homework. But I was reading the Rolling Stone list and, uh, the Jonas Brothers were in the Top 50. So I guess I should go buy a Jonas Brothers record.

You never know, you might find something you like. I don’t want to, you know, discriminate.

It’s a pretty diverse list, I gotta say, I guess that’s admirable.

So I’ll look forward to the Mercury Rev hip-hop album in 2009?

Don’t hold your breath on that one.


Snowflake Midnight
is out now on Yep Roc records, and the accompanying album Strange Attractor can be downloaded for free at the band’s web site.

Upcoming Mercury Rev tour dates:
12/12/08 – Fine Line, Minneapolis
12/14/08 – Fox Theater, Boulder
12/16/08 – El Rey, Los Angeles
12/17/08-12/18/08 – Independent, San Francisco

“Butterfly’s Wing”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate