Computer Glitterate

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Computer Glitterate

He helped win back Silicon Valley support for Clinton — and vice versa.

by Julie Pitta

#128 Steven P. Jobs, 42, Palo Alto, Calif. Party: D. $150,000 total contributions.

View Jobs’ itemized contributions.

Steve Jobs makes for a peculiar political activist; he’s reportedly not even registered to vote.

What’s more, despite having donated heavily (including $100,000 to the DNC) in 1996, he appears to want little for his money. Friends say Jobs just loves the perks that come with being a top contributor — like, say, his White House sleepover.

The Silicon Valley folk hero who founded Apple Computer in his 20s fell from grace in his 30s. But he bounced back a couple of years ago with Pixar, the company that created the computer animation wizardry of Toy Story. Now 42, Jobs is worth about $470 million, according to Forbes, and has left few ambitions unfulfilled. Except, perhaps, broader fame — which would explain why he would help Clinton reclaim Silicon Valley support he lost during his first term.

Many high-tech leaders had endorsed Clinton in 1992 over George Bush, a president who, the mostly apolitical crowd joked, couldn’t differentiate between computer chips and potato chips. But some turned away from Clinton after he vetoed a 1995 bill to discourage securities lawsuits. With their inherent volatility, Silicon Valley companies have been plagued by suits from shareholders who claim to have been misled about the value of their stock. (Although Clinton vetoed the higher hurdle for such suits — at the behest of securities litigator #126 Bill Lerach — he sent a clear, some would say cynical, signal that he would not fight the inevitable override, and the bill did eventually become law.)

As the re-election campaign heated up, Clinton realized his winking veto hadn’t done the trick. Sandy Robertson (#21), chairman of the San Francisco investment firm Robertson, Stephens & Co., who stayed close to Clinton even when many executives turned from him, met with the president last July. At issue was Proposition 211, a California state initiative that would have made securities lawsuits easier to file in state courts. Robertson says, “I warned Clinton: ‘You’ve lost these people unless you come out against 211.’ But I didn’t expect him to do it publicly since it was a state issue.”

Yet that’s just what Clinton did, right before a celebratory reconciliation dinner at Jobs’ Palo Alto home. (Jobs had sought #42 David Geffen’s advice on how to arrange such things.) The fete, attended by more than a dozen of Silicon Valley’s top executives, was followed two weeks later by a conference call to Clinton from 75 Silicon Valley executives, gushing their renewed support for the president.

Next Profile | MoJo 400 Central

 

The 400 List:

Browse
The full Mother Jones 400 list.

Profiles
Meet the people with political pull.

 

Searches:

Individuals
Search the top 400 political donors by name, industry, state, or contribution amount.

Itemized Contributions
The details of every donation, searchable by donor, recipient, date, amount, and more.

 

Discuss:

Money & Politics
Is campaign finance reform the way to a better government?

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate