Trying to Stop a Suicide Epidemic—While Loosening Gun Laws

In Utah, gun suicides now outpace traffic deaths. So why are legislators pushing for even easier access to firearms?


In the not-so-distant future, if current trends continue, more Americans will die from gun violence than from auto accidents, but the state of Utah is wrestling with the fact that it hit that grisly benchmark a few years ago. And it’s not “bad guys with guns” driving this trend; the vast majority of gun deaths in Utah for the past few years (89 percent in 2011; see chart) were people taking their own lives.

Among them was 14-year-old David Phan, who walked onto the skybridge in front of his junior high school this past November and, in front of his schoolmates, put a gun to his head and pulled the trigger. His death was one of more than an estimated 500 suicides in Utah in 2012, more than half of which likely involved a firearm. (Utah is one of only five states where gun suicides alone exceed traffic fatalities: Check out our state-by-state map.)

Driving fatalities, another leading cause of preventable death in Utah, hit a historic low in 2011 following a long, downward trend. But gun suicides have been rising. Utah is a pretty heavily armed state—nearly half of its residents own guns. At the same time, it is often referred to as the “most depressed state.” Utah residents consume antidepressants at twice the national rate and its rate of suicide—the state’s second-leading cause of death for ages 10 to 19—consistently beats the national average. Utah also leads the nation in the proportion of adults reporting suicidal thoughts.

Thanks to the easy availability of guns, more and more Utah residents have acted on those dark thoughts. The rate of gun suicides per 100,000 residents has jumped from an age-adjusted 7.8 in 1999 to 10.6 in 2010. And here’s a breakdown of the total numbers for 2011, the most recent year for which data is available:

And this is in spite of the fact that far more residents drive, and drive a lot, than own guns. Based on preliminary numbers, the 2012 gun suicide figure is expected to be higher still, according to Jenny Johnson, a spokeswoman for the Utah Department of Health.

The uptick in suicides has caught the attention of state legislators, who seem to have been particularly horrified by Phan’s death. But virtually all of their emphasis is on combating bullying, not on making it harder to kill yourself. The Legislature is on the verge of passing several laudable bills designed to increase communication between parents and school counselors, requiring school staff to notify parents if a student makes a suicide threat, for instance. But gun safety measures aren’t really on the table, even though nearly half of the young people who take their lives in Utah do it the way Phan did it.

Firearms are a “really politically sensitive topic for our state,” explains Johnson, the health department spokeswoman, who acknowledges the reality of the role of guns in suicide. “It is a risk factor if you have access to a gun and you have some of these other risk factors. We do tell people removing those lethal means is one way you may be able to prevent it. Especially for men and teens, where teens are very impulsive, the more lethal means they use, the less likely they are to survive.”

“Especially for men and teens, where teens are very impulsive, the more lethal means they use, the less likely they are to survive.”

There are some things legislators could do, even in a state where every other person is armed, such as mandating gun locks and secure storage for guns in the home. Research shows that suicide is an impulsive act—one study found that 25 percent of people who attempted it did so after deliberating for less than five minutes—and most had considered it for less than a day. Usually the impulse strikes not long after an interpersonal crisis of some sort. (Phan shot himself an hour and a half after being suspended from school and taken home by his mother.)

And lots of research shows that most people who attempt suicide and survive don’t ever try it again. That’s why suicide prevention efforts are often geared at making lethal means less accessible with things like gun locks and safes—to which kids should not be given the code. “Every minute you can delay, [a suicidal person] increases the chance that they might survive,” David Litts, executive secretary of the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention, told the Boston Globe recently.

Rather than pursuing these sensible steps, Utah is plowing ahead with measures that make guns even easier to get and carry. The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence has described Utah’s “crazy” gun laws as the nation’s weakest.  Among other things, last year Utah passed a law to allow people who’ve been indicted for a violent felony to buy a gun. Being charged with a violent crime is no longer grounds for suspending a concealed weapons permit in Utah.

The state Legislature apparently believes there’s still more to do: Last month, an 18-year-old made headlines when he came to the Capitol building sporting a 9 mm handgun on his hip. He had come to attend a hearing in support of a measure that would allow him to put a coat over his gun—in Utah, you can legally walk around openly armed in public, but you need a permit if you want to conceal your weapon. Last Friday, the Utah House passed a bill that would let residents pack concealed weapons without a permit, which would put it on the list of “constitutional carry” states like Vermont, Alaska, Wyoming, and Arizona—some of which rival Utah in terms of suicide rates.

Getting a concealed weapons permit in Utah now requires a background check, which last year weeded out more than 600 people, including many with convictions related to domestic violence, drugs, and alcohol. If the constitutional carry bill becomes law, that extra check on gun owners will disappear—more suicides could result, research suggests.

To its credit, Utah has done one thing right this year. Among the many gun bills the Legislature is considering, one that actually seems likely to pass includes a smart provision advocated by the Harvard Injury Control Research Center: HB 121 would let people hand over their guns to the police for 60 days if they suspect that they, or someone in their household, might be a danger to themselves or someone else.

Rep. Dixon Pitcher, the Republican who introduced the bill, told a Utah public radio station that he thought it would save lives. “This takes no rights,” he said. “I’m a strong believer in the Second Amendment, but it gives to the person who needs this the availability to have that gun away from the house for a short period of time.” Pitcher has the right idea, but whether his bill will be any match for the wave of new pro-gun laws the state seems bent on passing is anyone’s guess.

Note: All suicidal thoughts, behaviors, and attempts should be taken seriously. Get help 24/7 by calling the National Suicide Prevention LifeLine at 1-800-273-TALK. Help is also available online at www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org. Trained consultants will provide free and confidential crisis counseling to anyone in need.

Chart art sources: James Bond Icons and Richard Pasqua from the Noun Project

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate