California’s Own Hooverville, Circa 2009

Taylor Wiles

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


You may have seen Oprah‘s version of the Sacramento “tent city” story recently, which involves a sensationalist video (preview below, full report here) of reporter Lisa Ling talking to Dorothea Lange-styled Great Recession refugees. NBC and Fox News have also flocked to the story; by last weekend, authorities were turning away news crews. But this week, we went to visit the 300 people living in tents along the American River at the north end of downtown Sacramento, and what we found was quite a bit different from the version you’ll see on prime time. Here’s the factchecked reality of what’s going down at California’s “new” Hooverville.

First: There are about 300 chronically homeless people living in Sac-town tent cities, and man, are they sick of reporters. We brought a camera with us in hopes of shooting video for MoJo, but we were lucky just to get in and talk to people, let alone film. And forget the recession angle. Joan Burke, Director of Advocacy at a nearby homeless-oriented charity Loaves & Fishes, told us she “wouldn’t say the recession isn’t a cause” of the increasing number of tent city residents, but that the city didn’t happen overnight. The place has been slowly growing over the past two years mostly due to a de facto moratorium on arrests for illegal camping and the safety of sleeping in numbers. A local cop, Mike Cooper has been on the beat for almost nine years, and told us that he doesn’t “know anybody who just moved out of a foreclosed home,” who is now living in the tent city.

But after the initial surge of misleading news reports, something good has happened there. Loaves & Fishes saw an uptick in people donating their time and resources to aid the city’s homeless. The publicity has also forced the City of Sacramento to do something about tent city, what Mayor Kevin Johnson referred to as Sac-town’s “dirty little secret.” The City Council passed a resolution this week authorizing the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency to spend $880,000 “to address the immediate short term issues facing over 150 persons and families camping and sleeping in unsafe and unsanitary conditions.” The resolution, a stopgap measure to be sure, provides funding for a temporary increase in shelter beds as well as 68 new permanent housing slots. It enables the city to erase the now infamously visible tent city by giving the community an immediate place to go.

The resolution’s “Rationale for Recommendation” hints at the absurdity of the situation: “Similar to other communities around the world, homelessness continues to be visible throughout the City of Sacramento.” They have a good point: How did little old Sacramento become the symbol of the recession while there are similar communities across the country? Couldn’t Oprah just stay in Chicago and do a piece on the 73,000 homeless there?

Advocates for the Sacramento homeless say a long-term solution might be to make the tent city a self-governed legal community living area, similar to Portland’s Dignity Village. Once legal, the city could build basic infrastructure and local companies that have heretofore feared assisting an unsanctioned community would be permitted to donate amenities. 

Check back with Mother Jones for future updates.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate