“In Texas, We Don’t Turn Our Back on Children”

A Dallas judge’s controversial plan to shelter unaccompanied child migrants.

Undocumented immigrants at the bus station after they were released from a US Customs and Border Protection processing facility in McAllen, Texas.Eric Gay/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Clay Jenkins, a Democrat elected Dallas County judge in 2010, has a controversial plan for handling the recent massive influx of unaccompanied child migrants coming to Texas. Instead of immediately sending them back to where they came from, as Texas Gov. Rick Perry supports, or blocking buses from transferring migrants to local Border Patrol stations, as protesters in Murrieta, California, did recently, Jenkins wants to provide them shelter. His plan, which would be funded by President Obama’s emergency appropriations request, would allow temporary housing in the Dallas area for up to 2,000 unaccompanied migrant children.

Over the weekend three potential sites—two schools and a hospital—were inspected for use, and their doors could open for kids as soon as the end of this month. Mother Jones spoke with Jenkins about why he thought North Texas should help, how local residents are responding, and how he might reply to Perry, who plans to discuss the crisis Wednesday in Dallas with President Obama.

Mother Jones: How did you first become aware of this crisis, and how did you decide you had to get involved?

Clay Jenkins: I first saw media reports, and in my family we discuss what’s going on with our lives. So I was telling my eight-year-old daughter that I was struggling with this because I felt that we needed to do something for these children. But at the same time it was a very complex problem.

She was asking why all the children were being detained on the border, and I was explaining it was for her security and protection. She explained to me, “But daddy, these aren’t people, these are children.”

So that stuck in my mind, and I decided that this is something that couldn’t wait. We had the capability and the capacity in Dallas County, where there’s 2.5 million people. We have buildings that are vacant right now, and I know that our community has compassion. So I decided that there’s no good reason not to help these children, and that it’s time to stand up for these children.

“I saw children [at a detention center] sitting quietly crying, and other children looked zoned out. They were all dirty. And they clearly needed our help.”

MJ: You recently visited an immigration holding center in McAllen, near the Mexico border. Why did you decide to visit, and what did you find there?

CJ: I received reports from the White House and members of the faith community, the Border Patrol, and the Highway Patrol, but I wanted to get a firsthand look. And what I saw were children younger than one crying for their mother, while Border Patrol agents changed their diaper and tried to comfort them.

I saw siblings separated into holding cells that looked like the drunk tank in the county jail. It was designed to hold about six adults but had over 20 kids in them. I saw their faces pressed into glass as they looked across the area towards their siblings who were in other cells. I saw children sitting quietly crying, and other children looked zoned out. They were all dirty. There was a distinct smell of body odor there. And they clearly needed our help, so it just steeled my resolve to do what we can do to help these children.

MJ: The Dallas Morning News quoted you as saying, “If this is a political move, then I am the stupidest person in Texas.” Are you worried about the political backlash?

CJ: There’s a lot of upset people, and I think elected officials on some issues can’t be worried, can’t put political interest ahead of public interest. When it comes to children who are being treated in an inhumane way, then you forge ahead. These children couldn’t wait for the first Wednesday in November for someone to help them.

My hope is: We can’t help all these children, but we can help some of the children. And then by helping some of the children, perhaps that will inspire some others to help the children, because in urban areas across this country, we have facilities that can be retrofitted in the short term to help. And we just need to get the will to recognize that these are children and not others. That these are children just like your children and my children, just like our ancestors when they came across as children, except these children came across without their parents. And they are scared, alone, and they need our help.

MJ: What do you say to activists like those in Murrieta, California, who block buses filled with immigrant detainees headed for their city, or the mayor there, Alan Long, who has urged deportation?

CJ: I respect their opinion and I understand their fear, but these are children—they are precious children. They’re not a thing to be feared. They’re people to be embraced. And people for us to help. This isn’t about immigration reform, or border fences, or amnesty. This is about children.

“This isn’t about immigration reform, or border fences, or amnesty. This is about children.”

And my goal is to take children from overcrowded detention facilities on the border and put them in compassionate care here in Dallas County. And put some degree of normalcy back in their life. And let them know that at least here in North Texas there are people who love them and value them and don’t see them as aliens—we see them as children.

MJ: What did you learn from local residents after knocking on doors Sunday near one of the schools that could be a shelter?

CJ: I didn’t have a singular person who answered their door and said, “Not in my backyard.” All of them said, “I want to help these children.” I really appreciated that.

Calls to my office, and emails, and things of that nature, run about 50-50, but most calls against this are from people who don’t live in Dallas County. In fact, I get calls from all over United States and emails against it from all over the United States. But I think here in North Texas we’ve got a good capacity to be compassionate and to help. We are always a port in the storm, literally, for hurricane victims, because we are the largest metro area in the South that’s not on the ocean. We have 7 million people in four counties, Dallas being the largest. So our people are good at this.

“Most calls against this are from people who don’t live in Dallas County. In fact, I get calls from all over United States and emails against it from all over the United States.”

MJ: How did you settle on 2,000 kids? And will the shelters only house unaccompanied children?

CJ: At this time we only plan to use it for unaccompanied children, and to be honest with you, I picked the number because that doubles the capacity at Lackland [Air Force Base] and Fort Still [Army Base]. And I felt like it was an ambitious enough goal to try to double the capacity to help these children and twice as many beds in 30 days.

MJ: There are reports about a meeting between President Obama and Gov. Perry on Wednesday. Are you attending the meetings?

CJ: I cannot confirm whether or not I’m going to be at the meeting, but you can guess whether or not I’m going to be at the meeting, right? And I’m sure the White House will put out something later in the day.

MJ: How do you plan on responding to Gov. Perry based on his opinions about the surge?

CJ: I know that Gov. Perry is a compassionate person. We have worked well together in disasters before. We disagree on almost every partisan political issue, but my hope for Gov. Perry is that he won’t see this as a partisan political issue, that he’ll see this for what it is, precious children in need of our help. And this is Texas, and in Texas, we don’t turn our back on children.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate