These Israeli and Palestinian Kids Would Rather Sing Than Fight

The YMCA Jerusalem Youth Chorus offers high schoolers sanity in a world gone mad.

Jerusalem Youth Chorus in rehearsal.JYC

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


They come to the Jerusalem Youth Chorus from as far away as Ramallah (a Palestinian outlook in the occupied West Bank) and a moshav (a Jewish settlement) outside of Jerusalem. They speak Arabic, Hebrew, and often a bit of English. They are five tenors, eight sopranos, six altos, and seven basses. They are 13 Palestinians and 13 Israelis, all high school students. Some are friends of friends with Gilad Shaar, Naftali Frenkel, and Eyal Yifrach, the Israeli teens whose kidnapping and killing sparked the latest round of clashes; others grew up around the corner from Muhammad Khdeir, a 16-year-old Palestinian boy who was murdered in the wake of those kidnappings.

For the past two years, the chorus—the only mixed Israeli-Palestinian choral group in the Holy City—has met weekly in Jerusalem to sing at the international YMCA, one of the few places Arabs and Jews can meet comfortably. This summer, they’ve rehearsed several times a week—despite the rocket launches and airstrikes—in a flurry of preparations for their first international singing tour. It took them last week to Kyoto and Tokyo, where they could enjoy a break from the troubles at home.

Here the kids perform “Adinu,” based on a poem by the Sufi mystic Ibn ‘Arahi: “I believe in the religion of love, wherever love is found.”
 

Micah Hendler, the chorus’ founder and director, didn’t know whether anyone would show up for rehearsal on the day after Khdeir was killed, especially anyone from Palestinian East Jerusalem, in whose Shu’fat neighborhood the boy’s body was discovered. “Don’t risk your safety,” he recalls telling them. But half of the kids made it anyway—including half of the Palestinians.

“Then this girl comes in from Shu’fat,” Hendler says.

“How did you even get here?” he recalls asking her. “Like physically. How did you get here?”

“Well, I woke up to gunshots this morning and it was pretty awful,” she responded in Hendler’s recollection. “But being in my house kind of made me crazy because there was so much violence, so I just left my house and walked down the street and out of Shu’fat. Soldiers tried to stop me but I just ran away. I’m so glad I’m in rehearsal, and there’s nowhere else I’d rather be.”

The songs they sing aren’t usually about peace directly, but more about things that leads to it: empowerment, community, love, loss, connection to home. (“Peace is really cliché here now,” Hendler says.) At recent performances, they’ve drawn from a pool of about a dozen songs, from “Akanamandla” (a South African freedom song they sing in Zulu, Hebrew, and Arabic) to “Rolling in the Deep” and “Seasons of Love.” Earlier this year, the chorus was featured on East Jerusalem/West Jerusalem, an album by the Israeli singer and activist David Broza. Later this fall, Hendler’s group plans to shoot a remake of Philip Philips’ “Home” with YouTube popstar Sam Tsui.

Jerusalem Youth Chorus is about more than just music, though. Half of each three-and-a-half-hour rehearsal is devoted to dialogue: The kids openly discuss what’s going on between their peoples, with trained Arab-Jewish facilitators and translators on hand to assist.

Hendler started the chorus on grants and donations in 2011, five months after completing college. The ingredients were all there: He’d spent his summers growing up at Seeds of Peace, a Palestinian-Israeli peace camp; comajored in music and international relations at Yale; performed with the school’s prestigious a cappella group, the Whiffenpoofs; led community sing-alongs; and taken classes in Hebrew and Arabic. “This is probably his destiny,” a Yale rabbi told a school newspaper during the choir’s first year.

“I tell people I’m American,” says the choir director. “Some of the kids probably still don’t know what religion I am.”

Hendler, an American Jew, says he identifies with both sides in the conflict. One of his favorite sayings comes from Rumi, the 13th-century Persian poet and mystic: “Out beyond ideas of wrong-doing and right-doing, there’s a field. I’ll meet you there.”

But in a city like Jerusalem, it’s easy to get boxed in. “I tell people I’m American,” Hendler says, “which just means I’m not from here. Some of the kids probably still don’t know what religion I am.”

He recruited from schools in both East and West Jerusalem, promising students that they would learn to speak and sing in English as well as their native tongues, and raising the possibility of an international tour. Beyond musical talent, he was looking for open-mindedness and “positive energy”—traits that are difficult to audition for. For many, speaking during the dialogues is much harder than the singing.

Jerusalem, after all, is a city where Arabs and Jews live on opposite sides of town, attend segregated schools, and shop at separate stores. Within the safety of the rehearsal space, the singers befriend their counterparts from the other side. And then they go home. They get on Facebook and forget they have new friends who might take offense at, say, their liking of friend’s post that derives from the other side’s narrative. Or they’ll post something in the heat of the moment, when they’re angry about some development in the conflict. Their new friends will be hurt.

“Facebook might be our biggest problem,” Hendler says. He’s still not sure how to teach social media etiquette, or how to navigate the (so far limited) backlash to the chorus from the singers’ own communities. One Jewish girl openly challenged her rabbi in school to defend the choir; some parents begrudgingly let their kids come to rehearsal.

But they keep singing, despite it all. And because they live in a place where endless dialogue has so far failed to keep the peace, they sing first. Only then do they talk.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate