The Axis of Pork

Capitol Hill’s defense-reform killers.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The Bomb Thrower

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.)

Pet program: Will battle to the death for the partly Okie-built Future Combat Systems—the Army’s gee-whiz plan to interlink all manner of weapons, vehicles, and robots—which Gates slated for cancellation.

* Has accused Obama of trying to “disarm America” in order to increase “welfares.”

The Point Man

Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.)

Pet program: The F-22 is assembled in Georgia. This Cold War-era plane was put into production before being fully tested; technical problems have caused costs to skyrocket to $351 million, more than double original projections. This infamous golden turkey has never flown even a single combat mission.

* Chambliss may have finagled five deferments from the Vietnam War, but when it comes to legislative combat, he’s in his element. The Georgia delegation is the most aggressive defender of the F-22, which Chambliss has brought back from the brink of cancellation before.

The Cold Warrior

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.)

Pet programs: The F-22, whose engines are constructed in Connecticut. Also missile defense, which is not constructed in Connecticut. Lieberman just likes it.

* Lieberman will be a canny opponent of even minor cuts to missile defense—even if it means risking his fragile détente with the president.

Patty Murray

The Stealth Fighter

Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.)

Pet program: Seattle-based Boeing makes the C-17, part of Future Combat Systems, and also constructs wings and fuselages for the F-22.

* Murray, the leading recipient of defense and aerospace donations this election cycle, is resisting change to the Pentagon’s broken procurement process. She’s already tried to pass legislation banning cuts that cause job losses—basically a poison pill for reform.

The Humanitarian

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.)

Pet program: The C-17, a cargo plane assembled by 5,000 workers in Long Beach.

* For three years the Pentagon has said it doesn’t need any more C-17s, which cost around $266 million each. And for three years Boxer and the California delegation have insisted the government buy more. (She squares this with her anti-war résumé by arguing that they help humanitarian missions.) This year she helped secure eight more planes.

John Murtha

The Last Line of Defense

Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) and Rep. John Murtha (D-Penn.)

Pet programs: All of them. Inouye, known as “king of pork” and chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, and Murtha, the House’s top recipient of defense dollars, target of corruption probes, and earmarker extraordinaire, get Congress’ last word on DOD funding.

* Murtha, who often allots money for projects that the Pentagon has not requested, launched an annual contractors’ fair dubbed “MurthaFest.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate