Stop Mixing Up Islamic Flags: A Guide for Lazy Journalists

It’s time to get it right.

A tattered flag, most likely that of Hamas, flies in the rubble in Gaza after an Israeli strike.Lefteris Pitarakis/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When an armed assailant seized control of a café in downtown Sydney on Monday morning and forced two hostages to hold a black flag with Arabic script up to the window, many observers were quick to claim that ISIS, the self-proclaimed Islamic State that now dominates about a third of Iraq and Syria, was involved. The flag proved it!

It’s not that simple. Islamic groups, terrorist and otherwise, have adopted many different flags with Arabic script on them over the years. In August, members of the Kurdish community mistook a Palestinian flag with Islamic declarations on it for the ISIS flag, resulting in a violent fight. Over the summer, a New Jersey resident was pressured to take down a black flag bearing the shahada, or Islamic declaration of faith (“There is no god but God, Muhammad is the messenger of God”) after someone reported it to the Department of Homeland Security. The Jersey man had flown the flag for 10 years, and insisted (correctly) that it had nothing to do with ISIS. The ISIS flag features the shahada, but most flags with the shahada on them are not ISIS flags. In Sydney, the “ISIS” flag in the window was actually a simple black flag bearing the shahada.

Many Islamic flags look alike for a reason. “It’s not a coincidence that bin Laden made Al Qaeda’s flag black,” former FBI agent Ali Soufan writes in The Black Banners, his history of the fight against Al Qaeda. As Soufan notes, an Islamic hadith says that horsemen bearing black flags will ride from the historic Islamic city of Khurasan toward Jerusalem on the eve of the apocalypse: “Black banners will appear from the East and they will kill you in a way that has never before been done by a nation.” Many Islamic flags—especially those of militant groups—are black in reference to this hadith. Because of this—and the fact that few Westerners can read Arabic—it’s easy to mix up Islamic flags, extremist and otherwise. Here’s a brief guide (although it’s important to note that many Islamic militant groups use more than one flag):

1. Jabhat al-Nusra:

Jabhat al-Nusra members raise their flag on top of a helicopter in Syria. Edlib News Network/AP

Jabhat al-Nusra is an Al Qaeda affiliate in Syria. Its flag includes the white inscription at the top of the flag, which is the shahada, or the Islamic declaration of faith. Underneath the shahada is the name “Jabhat al-Nusra” in Arabic.

2. ISIS, or the Islamic State:

ISIS supporters march in Mosul, Iraq, in June STR/AP

ISIS’s flag features a handwritten, rougher version of the shahada. The top line reads: “La ‘ilaha ‘illa-llah,” meaning “There is no god but God,” and the white seal reads “God Messenger Mohammed.” The script is much less elaborate than other flags with similar messages. The white seal is meant to resemble the official seal of the Prophet Muhammad, though experts have debated what the seal actually looked like.

Al-Shabaab, an extremist Islamist group based in Somalia, uses a war flag that is the same as the one used by ISIS, though their “administration” flag uses the opposite colors—black inscriptions with a white background.

Wikimedia Commons

3. The Taliban:

Marcus Schmoger/Wikimedia Commons

The Taliban chose a white flag with a black inscription of the shahada when it took power over Afghanistan in 1997. There is some controversy over whether the flag was green, though most sources use the white flag now.

4. Al Qaeda:

Emerson Begolly/Wikimedia Commons

The black flag with a yellow inscription and circle has been identified as belonging to a coalition of groups in the Islamic State of Iraq, which merged with Al Qaeda in 2004. It was led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, according to Jihadism: Online Discourses and Representation by Rüdiger Lohlker. Al Qaeda still uses this flag, though it sometimes uses white instead of yellow.

5. Caucasian Emirate:

ArnoldPlaton/Wikimedia Commons

The Caucuses Emirate began after Chechen separatists failed to defeat Russian federal forces in multiple conflicts in the 1990s. The group practices radical Salafism and hopes to establish an independent Caucauses Emirate under Shariah law. Many smaller groups exist under the banner of the Caucuses Emirate. The flag resembles the official flag of Saudi Arabia, including the shahada and a sword, but uses black as its background color.

6. Official Flag of Saudi Arabia:

 

Open ClipArt Library

The flag of Saudi Arabia, officially adopted in 1973, also features the shahada: “There is no god but God, and Muhammad is the messenger of God.” It is green because it was rumored that green was Muhammad’s favorite color. The sword represents the founding dynasty of the country, the House of Saud, and its military victories.

8. Hamas:

Hamas supporters celebrate the 27th anniversary of Hamas in northern Gaza on December 12. Adel Hana/AP

The flag of Hamas, the largest Palestinian militant movement and one of its two primary political groups, features the shahada on a green background. Hamas is a Sunni Islamist group, and is designated by the United States as a terrorist organization.

9. Boko Haram:

ArnoldPlaton/Wikimedia Commons based on Boko Haram propaganda videos

Boko Haram, the radical Islamist militants in Nigeria known for kidnapping hundreds of young school girls in Chibok, have a symbol which features a simple black Islamic flag bearing the shahada atop an open book and crossed guns. The logo appears in videos purportedly released by Boko Haram, where the large black flags also appear in the background. Boko Haram sometimes carries black flags with white inscriptions on top and a white circle below similar to the ISIS flag, making it challenging to assess whether or not the group has an official flag.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate