Protesters Against Republican Convention Score a Victory. Democratic Protesters Could Be Next.

A judge struck down restrictions against protests of the Republican gathering in Cleveland.

The Republican National Convention will begin in Cleveland on July 18. Bill Clark/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A month before Republicans and Democrats gather for their party’s presidential nominating conventions, protesters against the proceedings have already won a big victory, and another could be on the way.

A federal judge ruled Thursday that the restrictions on speeches and demonstrations outside of July’s Republican National Convention planned by the city of Cleveland were unconstitutional. US District Judge James Gwin found that the restrictions limited free speech rights and issued a preliminary injunction that will block the regulations from going into effect next month, leaving the city with little time to figure out a new plan before the convention.

The ruling is a victory for the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, which brought the federal lawsuit challenging the restrictions last week. The ACLU’s lawsuit was joined by the liberal group Organize Ohio and the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless. The conservative grassroots organization Citizens for Trump was also a party to the lawsuit, arguing that the city’s proposed regulations also threatened the speech rights of Republicans wishing to hold demonstrations in support of Trump.

Shortly after the Cleveland ruling was released, the ACLU of Pennsylvania announced its own federal lawsuit against the city of Philadelphia on the behalf of a group that was denied a permit to hold a march during the first day of the Democratic National Convention. The ACLU argues that the current ban on marches during rush hour in Philadelphia’s Center City area violates the Constitution.

The Democratic convention will take place beginning on July 25, a week after the start of the Republican convention.

Cleveland officials had planned to create an “event zone” that would have limited large demonstrations and protest activity within 3.3 square miles of the convention site, an area encompassing most of downtown Cleveland. According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the city also planned to limit parades to a single route that could be used only during specified times of day, most of which are not expected to coincide with the times when convention delegates are likely to be downtown.

Freda Levenson, the legal director for the ACLU of Ohio, said in court that the event zone restrictions would create “a black hole for First Amendment activities” in the city during a political convention that is expected to draw a potentially volatile mix of politicians, reporters, delegates, and protesters to Cleveland.

Activists and civil rights groups have also expressed concern about other efforts to curb protests during the convention, including the increased frequency of law enforcement visits to the homes of activists likely to protest during the RNC.

After announcing his ruling, Gwin sent the case to mediation, a move that allows the city and the ACLU to negotiate new restrictions quickly and without further litigation. The ruling is not expected to affect the smaller security zone that will be set up by the US Secret Service during convention events.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate