Solar Eyesores

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


No one said saving the environment would be pretty, but suburban homeowners associations are blocking solar panel installations because they think they’re ugly, according to a recent article in the Los Angeles Times and MSNBC.com. Kevin Drum wrote that his homeowners association (HOA) would go ballistic if he installed panels on his roof, and he’s not alone as homeowners around the nation are battling their associations for the right to mount the energy savers on their property. The HOAs’ aesthetic arguments against energy conservation has pro-solar groups pushing for the federally protected right to solar installation. I contacted advocate Raymond Walker, Standard Renewable Energy’s Senior Vice President, to get the Houston-based solar installer’s take on the right to install panels, even if the neighbors don’t like the color.

Mother Jones: What is Standard Renewable Energy’s (SRE) take on the national battle between homeowners and homeowners associations over the right to install solar panels?

Raymond Walker: SRE believes every US homeowner should have the right to apply a renewable resource to their home. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 allows every property owner the right to install a satellite dish. In short, every homeowner has the right to cable television. SRE strongly believes that it is in the public’s best interest to provide homeowners the right to achieve energy independence.

MJ: What has SRE’s experience with homeowner groups entailed? To what extent has revenue fallen due to homeowner groups blocking installations?

RW: SRE works closely with property owner associations and homeowner groups to build solar systems that are aesthetically pleasing. SRE is often successful in reaching agreement with these associations, but we project losing nearly $2 million in revenue from those instances where HOAs reject the homeowner’s proposal to install solar.

MJ: A federal version of California’s Solar Rights Act is stalling in the Senate, but the bill—as it’s worded now—would make it illegal for homeowners associations to prohibit the installation of solar systems. What’s SRE’s position in this debate?

RW: All homeowners should be afforded the right to install solar. Several states have already enacted this legislation including Colorado and Arizona. We view these states as leaders and support a federal effort to provide homeowners the right to install and use this form of clean energy. Congress has already passed an extension of the residential solar tax credit. We believe it is reasonable and logical that they now provide homeowners the assurance they can avail themselves of these incentives.

MJ: What would you say to a homeowners association representative who’s against alternative energy for aesthetic reasons?

RW: Today solar arrays commonly go unnoticed as the technology improvements allow them to be placed in various colors and styles to match the existing structure of the home.

 

Good to know that the inconspicuousness of modern panels may make them more digestable for HOAs concerned with pink-flamingos-on-the-lawn tackiness. Appearance should be an irrelevant determinant for using a technology that reduces demand on a state’s energy grid, benefits ratepayers, and lowers homeowners’ utility bills while providing them with nontaxable subsidies from their public utility company. You do the math.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate