Texas Disregards All Scientific Knowledge in Its Latest Attack on Abortion Rights

The Lone Star State just released some required reading for women.

Brian Cahn/ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Aggressively anti-abortion policies in Texas make the state a center of controversy for those concerned with the future of reproductive rights. That trend continues this week with the release of a state-approved booklet that peddles a number of inaccurate claims about abortion, including debunked science linking abortions to cancer.

On Monday, the Texas Department of State Health Services released the latest edition of “A Woman’s Right to Know,” a guide given to women seeking abortions in Texas. The booklet is the result of a 2003 anti-abortion law that required the state to provide women seeking to terminate pregnancies with information about fetal development at least 24 hours before undergoing an abortion. The law requires that the information “be objective and nonjudgmental and be designed to convey only accurate scientific information about the unborn child at the various gestational ages.”

Similar materials are distributed in other states and often present information in ways that implicitly encourage women to carry their pregnancies to term. These guides usually make a number of claims not supported by science, such as suggesting that a fetus feels pain at 20 weeks’ gestation, or that having an abortion increases a woman’s risks of infertility, death, or suicide.

Previous versions of “A Woman’s Right to Know” have also suggested that women who give birth have a lower risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer compared with women who undergo abortions. The latest version of the booklet makes the same argument, noting that “research indicates that having an abortion will not provide you this increased protection against breast cancer.”

The claim that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer has been refuted by a number of medical organizations, including the American Cancer Society and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. But the link continues to be peddled by anti-abortion groups, including the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a medical group that ignores scientific information supporting vaccinations and abortion care. The group, which has published articles suggesting that Barack Obama used hypnosis to help sway voters in 2008, was a tea party favorite due to its resistance to the Affordable Care Act. Last week, Rewire reported that Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, has been a member of the AAPS for several years. While Price’s stance on the link between abortions and cancer is unknown, the Georgia congressman is staunchly opposed to abortion and has denied that women might struggle to afford birth control without insurance.

The dust-up over “A Woman’s Right to Know” is only one of several ongoing reproductive rights controversies in Texas. Last week, the Texas Department of Health and Human Services approved new rules requiring abortion providers to bury or cremate all fetal remains. The rules, which were approved after several Texas abortion restrictions were struck down by the Supreme Court this summer, will likely be challenged and result in the state returning for another court battle.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate