If it Looks Like Blackwater and Acts Like Blackwater…

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Why did Blackwater set up a new corporate identity when it inked a subcontract with Raytheon to train Afghan troops? Masking its scandal-tainted brand was the brainchild of its defense contractor client, according to a top executive for Xe Services (as Blackwater is now known).

Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday, Fred Roitz, an executive vice president at Xe, pulled back the curtain on the creation of Paravant, LLC. He suggested that Raytheon wanted to do business with Blackwater—so long as it didn’t appear that it was actually doing business with the controversial security firm. Roitz said it was his “understanding… that the request for a company other than Blackwater came from Raytheon.”

So Paravant was born. As Brian McCracken, a former Paravant vice president who now works for Raytheon, acknowledged, the subsidiary and Blackwater were effectively “one and the same.” Along with a bank account and address, Paravant also shared its corporate parent’s propensity for stirring up controversies. In May, two of the firm’s trainers, Justin Cannon and Christopher Drotleff, opened fire on an oncoming car, killing two Afghan civilians and wounding a third. The men are currently being prosecuted by the Justice Department on second-degree murder and weapons charges. A months-long investigation by the armed services committee followed, unearthing evidence [PDF] that Paravant personnel had acted recklessly, disregarded military regulations, and improperly acquired hundreds of AK-47s and other firearms that were intended for use by the Afghan National Police. The probe also indentified a series of vetting lapses by Blackwater and major oversight failures by the army officials that were supposed to be supervising its work.

Paravant’s two-year contract, which was worth about $20 million and expired last fall, was part of a 10-year, $11.2 billion Raytheon program called Warfighter FOCUS that is overseen by the Army’s Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation (PEO STRI).

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), a member of the committee, described Paravant as a “classic example of a cover corporation,” created to deceive government contracting personnel about the true corporate governance of Paravant.

Apparently, it worked. Both the PEO STRI contracting officer overseeing Paravant’s work, Steven Ograyensek, and the head of its contracting office, James Blake, testified on Wednesday that they were unaware that Paravant was linked to Blackwater. That is, until the connection became public following the May shooting involving Cannon and Drotleff. (A source close to Blackwater, however, scoffed at the suggestion that PEO STRI was unaware of Parvant’s corporate parent. “All they had to do was look at the address,” he said.)

McCaskill said Raytheon’s apparent attempt to “cover the fact that they were actually contracting with Blackwater” was “very troubling.” And she hinted that Raytheon officials may be called upon to answer for this. (A Raytheon spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.)

In a statement, Raytheon spokesman Jon Kasle declined to directly address Roitz’s claim, but said the company’s client, PEO STRI, had been “involved” in the “evaluation and selection process” of subcontractors, including Paravant. “Paravant employees subsequently violated policies of their contract which led to our termination of the relationship for cause last year. Raytheon has been working closely with our customers to enhance controls, procedures and oversight of contractor and subcontractor personnel. We will continue to work with our customers to ensure that strong oversight supports the success of our training services programs.”

“There’s clearly an effort to coverup that Blackwater was the real contractor here,” said Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the committee’s chairman. He added later, “This is some very serious business we’re talking about here…This is deception.”

During the hearing, McCaskill grilled Roitz about Xe’s infamously opaque corporate structure. Under Blackwater founder Erik Prince, who stepped down as the company’s CEO last March, the firm created an ever expanding network of subsidiaries and related entities, incorporating some of them in tax havens like the Bahamas.

When McCaskill asked Roitz how many names Blackwater/Xe is actually operating under, he was unable to enumerate the extent of Prince’s corporate holdings. He told the Senator he would have to get back to her so he didn’t “forget any.” He added, “We have many names.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate