A Lobbyist Detective’s Strange Quest to Find Seth Rich’s Murderer

How Jack Burkman became an unlikely central figure in a world of conspiracy theories.

Sean Hannity, Newt Gingrich, and Julian Assange have all helped fuel conspiracy theories about the murder of Seth Rich, right.James West/Mother Jones

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Seth Rich was dead, and Jack Burkman was thinking of his mom. Back in the ’80s, when Burkman got to Georgetown Law School after growing up near Pittsburgh, sheā€™d warned him to be careful in his new city. Now he pictured her getting a call from the police, informing her that her son had been shot to death near his Washington home. It tugged at his heart. Most people would have stopped there. Burkman decided to find the killer.

He wasnā€™t a cop or a private eyeā€”just a 51-year-old Republican lawyer and lobbyistā€”but he didnā€™t care. If he didnā€™t solve the case, he thought, no one else would.

The facts seemed relatively straightforward. On July 10, 2016, Rich, a 27-year-old Democratic National Committee staffer, was murdered, shot in the back. His night had started with drinks at Louā€™s City Bar and ended with a long walk home, during which he talked on the phone with his girlfriend, Kelsey. Around 4:20 a.m., Kelsey heard voices in the background, and Rich calmly told her that he needed to go. Almost immediately afterward, the police departmentā€™s gunfire detectors reported shots fired near Rich’s home. When officers found him, he was still alive. Later that morning, he died at a local hospital.

In the year since, people from Julian Assange to Newt Gingrich to the Finnish-German hacker Kim Dotcom have suggested they know what really happened: Rich leaked the DNC emails that helped sink Hillary Clintonā€™s campaign, and he got killed in retaliation. There is no evidence to support these claims, but it hasnā€™t mattered. The Seth Rich conspiracy theory has been splashed across the home pages of Fox News and Breitbart and remains a fixture of the alt-right imagination.

And Burkman has managed to put himself at the center of it all. He stood next to Richā€™s parents and offered $100,000 of his own money to find the killer. He was cited as a family ally and investigator in the Washington Post and Newsweek. And as some of the other leading conspiracy theorists in the Rich case have lost interest and moved on, Burkman still hasnā€™t.

From the beginning, the police said they believed the murder was a robbery gone wrong. There had been a string of armed robberies in the area, and there were bruises on Richā€™s hands and legs that suggested an altercation. He still had his wallet on him, but his watch wristband was damaged. Most important, no one had any reason to murder him. Rich was an amiable kid from Omaha. On the Fourth of July, he mugged for the camera in an American-flag button-up and star-spangled slacks. In his free time, he scoured Reddit to find memes to send his older brother, Aaron.

A day or two after Richā€™s death, Aaron noticed that Reddit users were drawing strange conclusions. On July 12, a ā€œstaunch supporter of Senator Sandersā€ on Reddit combed through Richā€™s LinkedIn profile to build a 1,400-word case for why Rich may have been on the verge of exposing election fraud perpetrated by the Clintons. His conclusion: ā€œI believe that Hillary Clinton’s team or the DNC could have colluded to dispose of this young man who happened to be exposed to a little too much information.ā€

At first, Aaron says, it was funny, a distraction from the grief. The news stories, he says, started as ā€œā€˜a DNC staffer was killed.ā€™ And then it was a DNC official that was killed. Then it became a top DNC official that was killed.” He adds, “Hell, by the end of the day he could have been Hillaryā€™s running mate.ā€

The conspiracy kept getting more bizarre. In August, Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, announced that he was offering a $20,000 reward for information leading to Richā€™s killer. On a Dutch TV show, an incredulous host asked Assange what he was implying.

ā€œI am suggesting that our sources take risks and they become concerned to see things occurring like that.ā€

ā€œBut was he one of your sources then?ā€

ā€œWe donā€™t comment on who our sources are.ā€

Burkman respected Assangeā€™s ability to ā€œmake news,ā€ but he didnā€™t think his theory added up. Rich worked with polling place data at the DNC. He wasnā€™t the IT guru of Redditorsā€™ imagination.

Burkman had reached out to Richā€™s parents in Omaha, Joel and Mary, who appreciated his offer to provide a six-figure reward for information leading to the killer. They hoped it could get a friend or family member to incriminate the culprit, according to a source close to the family. In November, Joel and Mary came to Washington to speak at a press conference where Burkman announced his reward. Mary thanked Burkman for helping even though he was a Republican who knew nothing about them. She said Seth was smiling, knowing that people were coming together, across party lines, to solve a problem.

The Riches found the conspiracy theories repulsive, an insult to their sonā€™s memory. They told reporters that Rich was a good guy who followed the rules. He would never betray the Democratic Party. If the police said it was an attempted robbery, it probably was. ā€œHow can people stoop so low?ā€ they asked.

But one question kept nagging at Burkman: Who robs someone and leaves a wallet?

Initially, he was happy to set aside his doubts and focus on searching for clues. It was unusual work for a man who bills himself as Washington’s top Republican lobbyist (citing an article from the Hill reporting that he signed up more clients in 2013 than any other lobbyist). Solving a murder may not have been Burkmanā€™s specialty, but that didnā€™t stop him from letting a reporter tag along. In February, he suggested we meet in the lobby of the Mayflower Hotel before canvassing the area where Rich had been killed.

Burkman arrives in his standard uniform: black athletic pants and a puffer jacket. He grips my palm for a few seconds longer than most people would consider normal and apologizes for being late. He wastes no time hailing a cab. During the ride, he explains that he has a great working relationship with the Riches. They do what he and his PR team tell them, and they send Omaha Steaks, too.

Noah Lanard

We get out on U Street, once DCā€™s ā€œBlack Broadwayā€ but now a jumble of upscale bars and glassy apartment buildings. He approaches a woman standing by the corner. ā€œHi, Iā€™m Jack Burkman. Iā€™m a lawyer. I represent the family of Seth Rich.ā€

ā€œIā€™m not interested, okay?ā€

The next stop is a basement-level incense shop staffed by a group of profoundly unoccupied men. This time he gets to finish his spiel. ā€œDo you know Seth Rich?ā€ he says. ā€œIā€™m looking for anybody who knows anything.ā€ The men think hard but come up with nothing.

Back on the street, Burkman acknowledges that the murder, already six months past, occurred a mile away. But he says heā€™s investigating a series of expanding concentric circles. At this point, heā€™s probably canvassed the area more than a dozen times. ā€œIā€™ve gotten a sense of who would know and wouldnā€™t know,ā€ he says as we approach the Why Not Boutique, where heā€™s greeted by a man in a sequined jacket and a woman wearing a magicianā€™s hat. They donā€™t know anything either.

After stopping into a plant shop, a dry cleaner, and a soul food jointā€”all fruitlessā€”Burkman decides itā€™s time to go. To where is unclear. Before thereā€™s time to ask, he takes off alone in a cab.

Burkman started off on a fairly conventional path in Washington. After law school, he landed a job in New York Republican Rep. Rick Lazioā€™s office. In 1996, he cashed in as a lobbyist at the Smith-Free Group. Six years later, he formed his own shop, J.M. Burkman & Associates. But media was his true passion.

Burkman started speaking regularly on TV about the Whitewater scandal that Lazio investigated on the House Banking Committee. He appeared on Fox News and Bill Maherā€™s show, but he never broke though. He wistfully recalls the talking heads who did: Dan Abrams, Joe Scarborough, Rush Limbaugh. His tone evokes a major league player sent to the minors and never called back up. In college, Burkman says, he landed a job at Newsweek, but his mom made him go to law school.

Before it went defunct, Burkman’s website was mostly a compilation of his TV hits. He let it go offline because he prefers to steer traffic to the page for his radio showBehind the Curtain, which he bills as the only talk show in America hosted by a registered lobbyist. He says he pays Radio America for the airtime. The segments are also on YouTube, where some have gotten a single view or none at all.

The compulsion to make news has frequently gotten the best of him. After Michael Sam became the first openly gay player drafted into the NFL in 2014, Burkman, as a private citizen, proposed legislation to ban gay players from the league. Burkmanā€™s brother, who is gay, told the Huffington Post that Burkman had crossed a line. ā€œIt is just an attention grab and a media grab to pander to those folks who pay him to lobby on their behalf,ā€ he said. Burkman says he ā€œwas opposed to gay marriage and needed something to dramatize it.ā€

Burkmanā€™s lobbying record includes its own theatrics. When the Hill reported that his firm signed up 70 clients, Burkman admitted that his desire to be ā€œsqueaky cleanā€ may have led him to register more clients than he needed to. Two clients I spoke with said they paid Burkman less than the amount he reported to the government, and a similar discrepancy involving a third client appears in a court document. (Burkman says he doesnā€™t personally prepare the reports but tells everyone he works with to be ā€œ100 percent accurate.ā€)

Few of his clients have worked with a Washington lobbyist before. Desert Lakes University, which like many of Burkmanā€™s clients lacks a working phone number, boasts on its Facebook page that it provides ā€œeducation for individuals to prepare them for the future without charging the for tuition [sic].ā€ Desert Lakes’ website went offline several years ago. Burkman calls the school a startup. Another client, the Black Moon Corporation, hopes to build a repository of genetic material akin to the library of Alexandria inside a crater on the moon.

Ralph Palmieri, Burkman’s part-time lobbying partner, says their typical clients are middle-aged and older businessmen who are not afraid to take a chance with their money. “Theyā€™ve made some good decisions over the course of time,” he says. “And theyā€™ve made some terrible ones.”

Burkman mostly focuses on getting his clients federal grants and contracts. They rarely do, according to government spending records. Palmieri says going for government money, like other investments, involves risk. He compares it to gambling in Vegas. The odds arenā€™t great, but the payoff can be.

Burkman hasn’t done much to increase his clout through donations and fundraising, as many Washington insiders do. Over the years, his federal political contributions have come to $3,980. Last May, Burkman canceled his plans to host an unauthorized fundraiser for Donald Trumpā€™s presidential campaign after a campaign lawyer sent him a letter ā€œformally disavowingā€ his efforts, or in Burkman’s words a “bully” letter. Five weeks later, Burkman hosted an unofficial fundraiser for Free the Delegatesā€™ campaign to stop Trump at the Republican National Convention. Burkman told Rolling Stone that the event raised a little more than $500,000. Beau Correll, a Virginia lawyer and a founder of Free the Delegates, said in an email that he was informed that the event had raised $600 from two or three attendees. Correll calls Burkman a modern-day ā€œFlim Flam Man,ā€ adding that his research into Burkman ā€œraised more red-flags than a Chinese military parade.ā€

In 2015, one of Burkmanā€™s former clients, SouthWind Capital Partners, sued him for $1 million for allegedly violating an agreement that barred him from signing up its clients. Burkmanā€™s deposition in the case started out on a confident note: ā€œThere is no person Jack Burkman. My name is John Burkman.ā€ He became less sure of himself from there.

ā€œAbout how many employees do you have?ā€ he was asked.

ā€œThatā€™s a good question,ā€ Burkman replied. ā€œWe have a lot of subcontractors. I would put it that way.ā€

When presented with a copy of the agreement that appeared to have his signature, Burkman claimed to have no memory of signing it. ā€œThat doesnā€™t mean I didnā€™t sign it,ā€ he added before congratulating his interlocutor for forcing him into a corner. ā€œYou’re going to go far in the legal profession.ā€

The questions later turned to a grant request for one of Burkmanā€™s clients. ā€œSo you, on behalf of Waste to Energy, requested $525 million from the Department of Energy through the Bioenergy Technologies Office?ā€

ā€œRight. Correct.ā€

But the agency ā€œcould not award that money because, among other reasons, the amount you requested was more than double the annual budget for the entire office. Correct?ā€

ā€œThat’s what it says here.ā€

After the request was rejected, Burkman had told his client he would do it through a congressional spending bill instead. ā€œDid you ever do that?ā€ he was asked.

ā€œNo.ā€

ā€œDid you ever attempt to do that?ā€

ā€œI don’t remember. That I don’t remember.ā€

Burkman says he paid SouthWind a settlement last year. Bryan Nowak, SouthWindā€™s CEO, declined to comment, citing a confidentiality clause in the settlement. Burkman is less reticent, saying the case was a question of who introduced whom to whom.

The lawsuit hasnā€™t stopped him from bringing on more clients. Global Strategic Allianceā€™s founder, Kevin Jessip, says a friend introduced him to Burkman. His group works to preserve Judaeo-Christian values by, among other things, providing Syrian refugees with temporary shelter. Everything he saw online about Burkman checked out, so he decided to hire him and go for a $20 million federal grant. In the meantime, heā€™s ā€œprayerfully standing byā€ as he waits to move forward ā€œwith the help of Burkman.ā€ Burkman says he is helping him with other priorities like getting a National Day of Prayer written into law.

Burkmanā€™s next move in trying to find Richā€™s killer is to stage a live reenactment of the murder. He calls it a ā€œCalifornia thing.ā€ Burkman and his PR team plan to hire 6 to 10 actors. They will play Rich, his friends, potentially his girlfriend, and at least one assailant. The performance will start at Louā€™s City Bar and retrace Richā€™s one-and-a-half-mile walk home before arriving at ā€œthe very spot where his life ended.ā€ Burkman hopes the publicity will lead people to come forward with new information about the murder.

He believes the reenactment has to happen when itā€™s warm out, which leaves a lot of downtime. Fortunately, heā€™s in touch with a secret source whoā€™s leading him down a new path. In early March, at a Marriott near his Arlington townhouse, Burkman tells me about the latest development. Joining him is Jack Jr., the chocolate dachshund he calls his baby.

Throughout the conversation, Jack Jr. sits in Burkmanā€™s arms and barks at the hotel bar’s patrons. The waitress tries to keep a straight face as Burkman orders a bowl of whipped cream for his dog. After she brings it, Burkman drops a dollop in his coffee, adds two Equals, and puts the plastic bowl on the floor. Jack Jr. drops from his lap and gets to work. (At our next interview, a different Marriott waiter will ask Burkman, apparently a regular, ā€œIs this your boy who eats chicken and filet mignon?ā€ before bringing over a bowl of ice cream for Jack Jr.)

But weā€™re not here to watch a dog eat whipped cream. After a ā€œcloak and daggerā€ meeting at a restaurant in the Four Seasons, Burkman says he has concluded that Rich was killed by Russian operatives for discovering that they were behind the DNC hack. He thinks his source is the ā€œreal deal,ā€ in part because he knows about the SAVAK, the deposed Shah of Iranā€™s secret police force. Burkman says hardly anyone has heard of them so heā€™s probably legit.

Noah Lanard

The Russia hack of the DNC was widely reported a month before Rich was killed, but Burkman says the story wasnā€™t out there in a significant way. “In my mind, anyway, the timeline works perfectly.ā€

Burkman admits that the case is getting ā€œstranger and stranger and stranger by the week.ā€ In fact, itā€™s becoming a total media circus. Television crews are knocking on the Richesā€™ door in Omaha, he says, and Burkmanā€™s getting calls to work on other cases. His friends are starting to call him Colombo and Angela Lansbury, though he would prefer Steve McGarrett from Hawaii Five-0. Either way, itā€™s too much for him. ā€œMy life is becoming insane and I need to settle things down.ā€

Heā€™s sorry that the Rich family is suffering too. He says they donā€™t ā€œunderstand the pain involved in getting closure.ā€ But media attention is essential to solving the murder. ā€œThis is very hard for a grieving family to understand.ā€

He hopes to finish in 30 days, and he says Jack Jr. does too. Burkman thinks heā€™s close. The ā€œworld of happenstanceā€ is out, he says. The murder was planned: ā€œSomebody whacked him.ā€ Burkman isnā€™t worried about the ā€œpotentially hugeā€ international ramifications if Russia is responsible. His job is to close the case.

When itā€™s closed, he fantasizes about going ā€œsomewhere where there are only animals and no people.ā€ No people, he repeats. Maybe Antarctica in the summer, or Congo. ā€œThe deep Congo jungle,ā€ he says, lingering on the thought. ā€œThe Congolese jungle. Iā€™m ready to be done. Iā€™m ready to be done.ā€

By now, Burkmanā€™s theory about the Russians killing Rich has already made news as aDaily Mail “exclusive.” This turns out to be too much for the Rich family. An unnamed family member tells DCist that learning about the Russia theory was like “having a semi come up and t-bone you in the intersection.ā€ The Richesā€™ spokesman, Brad Bauman, tells the website that “the family certainly thanks Jack for the spotlight that he has brought to this caseā€ but that ā€œthe truth is that the family needs to have the independence to ensure that this is being investigated in a responsible way and without any particular political or conspiratorial agenda.” Aaron establishes an independent GoFundMe campaign to help solve the case.

Burkman says his work will now ā€œproceed on a parallel track.ā€ Burkman schedules a press conference to announce the creation of the ā€œSeth Rich Investigative War Room.ā€ He arrives in a winter trench coat, crocodile loafers, and an uncommonly shiny suit. Behind him is a ā€œDo You Know Who Murdered Seth Rich?ā€ ad that he has paid for on a bus stop shelter. He says a new entity called the Profiling Project will use forensic psychology to create a portrait of the murderer. Throughout the event, reporters correct him for flubbing facts, including the size of the reward heā€™s offering. They ask if the Rich family is working with the investigation center. ā€œWeā€™ve apprised them,ā€ he says.

Flanking Burkman are a George Washington University forensic psychology grad student who never removes his wraparound sunglasses and a former GW visiting forensic psychology professor. After the event, they stress that the Profiling Project is independent from Burkmanā€™s war room. The grad student says he wishes the press conference never happened. Mostly, they seem confused about what theyā€™ve gotten themselves into.

Burkman keeps trying to make news in the months that follow. But it gets harder. The Associated Press sent a reporter to the press conference but never writes anything about Burkmanā€™s investigative center. When I ask about the status of the reenactment, initially slated for around Memorial Day, he says not to wait. Instead, he promises ā€œsome real results and findingsā€ from the Profiling Project. (Later, he emails to say heā€™ll announce a reenactment date on July 12, the anniversary of Richā€™s death. Rich died on July 10.)

Then Burkman is pushed further from the spotlight. In May, Washingtonā€™s Fox 5 unleashes a startling exclusive. Rod Wheeler, an investigator working with the Rich family who is also a Fox News contributor, says he has sources at the FBI tying Seth Rich to WikiLeaks. Breitbart and Fox News lead with the story, and hundreds of thousands of tweets follow.

The police say the story is ā€œunfounded,ā€ and the Richesā€™ spokesman says there is a ā€œspecial place in hellā€ for the people promoting it. Joel and Mary Rich write in the Washington Post, ā€œImagine that every single day, with every phone call you hope that itā€™s the police, calling to tell you that there has been a break in the case. Imagine that instead, every call that comes in is a reporter asking what you think of a series of lies or conspiracies about the death. That nightmare is what our family goes through every day.ā€

Amid the backlash, Wheeler changes his story and tells CNN he doesnā€™t actually know anything about the murder. But itā€™s already too late. Seth Rich is the story of the week. Gingrich and Sean Hannity raise doubts about the policeā€™s version of events, and Sean Spicer has to respond to a question about Rich at a White House briefing. A week later, Fox News retracts its story after concluding that it didnā€™t meet the networkā€™s editorial standards.

While Wheeler appears on Hannityā€™s show, Burkman puts out a statement that almost everyone ignores. He is an afterthought at the sagaā€™s most covered turn.

He keeps pursuing his investigation. In June, the Profiling Project puts out an 83-page report concluding that Rich was probably killed by a hired or serial killer, not robbers. The evidence for the finding boils down to the lack of clues at the scene. Newsweek writes that the report seems to be ā€œmore credible, given the academic backgrounds of the volunteers.ā€

At a press conference unveiling the report, Burkman says heā€™s just following the ā€œtributariesā€ of evidence. He is ā€œanything and everything but a conspiracy theorist,ā€ and this isnā€™t ā€œSean Hannityā€™s program.ā€

ā€œThis will continue,ā€ he says. ā€œAnd we will fight on until we know the cause of Sethā€™s death. There will be no stopping.ā€

ā€œWeā€™re not going away anytime soon. If ever.ā€

As things wrap up, Burkman is asked about his relationship with the Riches. He says he loves them, but theyā€™re going through a tough time. ā€œThey didnā€™t understand what they were getting into.ā€

Update 7/10: On the anniversary of Rich’s death, his family released a statement that appeared to include indirect references to Burkman’s investigation. “We are compelled to address those who are claiming to help by undertaking private ‘investigations’, staging reenactments, or traveling to Sethā€™s old neighborhood to perform citizen interviews,” the family said. “Our request is that anyone with information about Sethā€™s murder share such information with MPD, which is the law enforcement agency authorized by law to perform this investigation.”

Image credit: Hannity: Brian Cahn/ZUMA; Gingrich: Efrem Lukatsky/AP; Assange: Dominic Lipinski/ZUMA; Rich: LinkedIn; background: littleclie/Getty

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate