A Federal Judge Ordered Wealthy Orange County to Find Housing for its Homeless

The county has nearly 5,000 people experiencing homelessness and the problem is getting worse.

Denise Lindstrom, a 49-year-old homeless woman, sits in a wheelchair in front of a moving truck in an homeless encampment on the Santa Ana River trail in Anaheim, Calif.Jae C. Hong/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A federal judge in California is fed up with how officials in affluent Orange County treat homeless people, and on Tuesday he demanded that they work to find shelter for dozens living in encampments along the Santa Ana River.  

“I’m tired of the paperwork and the ‘we can’t get it done’ nonsense,” District Court Judge David Carter told attorneys in a lawsuit filed by a group of homeless people and a local anti-poverty nonprofit against the county and several cities. “I’m looking for solutions.”

The suit aimed to prevent Orange County and the cities of Anaheim, Costa Mesa, and Orange from clearing the camps. Carter told lawyers for both sides on Tuesday that he wanted county officials to devise an alternative plan for temporarily housing those people living there with the hopes that it could turn into a more permanent solution. That evening they reached a verbal agreement that would let the county eliminate the riverside homeless encampment by next week.

Under the proposed agreement, the county would start dismantling the homeless camps on February 20 and will offer vouchers for 400 motel rooms for those living along the river for up to 30 days. It would also open another 360 shelter beds in parking lots and a women’s shelter. That will temporarily house the somewhere between 400 and 1,000 homeless people that live along the two-mile stretch along the river.  

The judge’s order came just weeks after attorneys for seven homeless people and the Orange County Catholic Worker, a nonprofit that provides assistance to the poor, filed a lawsuit against the county, as well as the cities of Anaheim, Costa Mesa, and Orange, to prevent officials from clearing the camps. The suit argued that the municipalities violated homeless people’s constitutional rights by pushing them into outlying areas without offering enough shelter and housing and enforcing anti-camping ordinances. 

In late January, Orange County officials began evicting homeless people from a homeless camp along the river after officials received complaints from residents. But in a county with nearly 5,000 people experiencing homelessness, Orange County officials created 525 shelter beds last year, with another 100 more expected to come in 2018, the Los Angeles Times reported. Eve Garrow, a homelessness policy analyst for the ACLU of Southern California, told the Times that there was an estimated one shelter bed for every two homeless people in the area. The county’s homeless population has surged over the past year, with more than half of homeless people unsheltered. It mirrors a troubling rise in homelessness across California, thanks to insufficient affordable housing and skyrocketing rents.  

On February 7, Carter granted a temporary restraining order against Orange County officials that prevented sheriff deputies from arresting homeless people who didn’t want to leave the encampments along the Santa Ana River. 

The Orange County case is just the latest in which cities have reckoned with challenges to its laws governing homelessness—and have led to plans to create shelters. Just miles away in Pomona, California, a legal settlement in 2016 over the city’s confiscation of property prompted city officials to build lockers for homeless people and prevented the city from enforcing its anti-camping ordinance until there were enough shelter beds for every homeless resident. The city then approved a plan to create a temporary shelter with 175 beds. On Wednesday, Carter visited the homeless encampment for the fifth time, telling the Times the county’s clearing should be done “humanely and with dignity.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate