The ACLU Is Accusing Nebraska of Illegally Obtaining Death Penalty Drug

It’s unclear how the state acquired the fentanyl it wants to use for lethal injection.

Nebraska's death chamberNate Jenkins/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A new letter to the Drug Enforcement Agency from the American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska is calling on the DEA to investigate Nebraska State Penitentiary officials for allegedly illegally obtaining drugs to use in lethal injections.

Records obtained by the ACLU of Nebraska show that the Nebraska’s government acquired fentanyl, a Schedule II controlled substance without the proper DEA approval, potentially acquiring the drugs through illegal means. According to the ACLU of Nebraska, prison officials obtained the drugs in order execute Jose Sandoval and Carey Moore. “The state of Nebraska can’t continue to cut corners and play fast and loose with federal law,” says Danielle Conrad, the executive director of the state ACLU.

Nebraska hasn’t carried out an execution in more than two decades. In 2015, the state legislature voted to repeal the death penalty, but after a successful ballot initiative in 2016, backed by Republican Gov. Pete Ricketts and funded by his GOP megadonor father Joe Ricketts, Nebraskans voted overwhelmingly to bring it back. Facing the same drug shortage that has plagued death penalty states, Nebraska proposed using fentanyl, the drug that’s playing an outsized role in the opioid epidemic, in its lethal injection cocktail. The drug has never been used in a lethal injection. In late 2017, the state issued a death warrant for Sandoval saying fentanyl would be one of the drugs used to kill him followed by a warrant for Moore in January. The executions have not yet been scheduled.

In order to regulate controlled substances, the DEA gives registration numbers to different individuals and institutions that regularly handle drugs such as hospitals and researchers. It is illegal for an institution to possess a drug without the proper DEA registration number. The Nebraska State Penitentiary’s registration numbers only allows it to handle Schedule IIIN, which includes drugs like testosterone and the anesthetic ketamine, and Schedule IV, which includes anti-anxiety drugs like Xanax and Valium.

The prison facilities also includes a hospital, which is legally able to dispense a wider class of drugs, including fentanyl. DEA regulations says that the hospital can only give these drugs to patients. So, while the hospital theoretically has access to fentanyl, it cannot dispense those drugs to prisoners on death row who are not patients.

Nebraska’s proposed lethal cocktail calls for diazepam, a sedative, and fentanyl to render the prisoner unconscious, cisatracurium to paralyze the inmate, and finally potassium chloride to stop the heart. But medical experts say that if the first two drugs aren’t administered properly, the paralytic would leave the inmate unable to scream or move to indicate pain. Nevada has also proposed using the same protocol. 

This isn’t the first time Nebraska has come under fire for trying to obtain lethal injection drugs. In 2015, the state tried to import sodium thiopental, a drug that renders the inmate unconscious, from a broker in India. The US Food and Drug Administration barred the shipment because the agency does not approve the drug.

It’s unclear how the state managed to obtain fentanyl, raising questions about its quality. Much to the dismay of the state’s ACLU, Nebraska has refused to comply with open records requests. The civil liberties group has filed a lawsuit to compel the state to reveal its drug sources. “The bottom line is this is just the latest in a long series of illegal efforts by the state to kill someone on death row,”says Amy Miller, the ACLU of Nebraska’s legal director.

Read the letter below.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate