A Long-Shot Democrat Now Has a Chance at Congress After Trump’s Buddy Got Indicted

Chris Collins, not happy. Nate McMurray, happy.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

When Nate McMurray, the long-shot Democratic candidate in New York’s ruby-red 27th District, went out for a jog on an 88-degree Wednesday morning, he had just four campaign volunteers and a hair’s breadth of a chance to unseat Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY).  

Then, everything changed. 

“My phone started melting,” McMurray told Mother Jones the next day. “I couldn’t get through my audiobook. It was just message after message after message.”

Collins, the first sitting congressman to endorse Donald Trump, had just been indicted on insider trading charges. And McMurray, the 43-year-old town supervisor of Grand Island, a small town less than 10 miles from Niagara Falls, had suddenly found himself in a competitive race for a district Trump won by 24 points in 2016

As the rest of the political world would soon discover, Collins had used information gleaned from his position as a board member at a pharmaceutical company to alert his son and close associates of a failed test for a new company drug before news of it became public. Federal investigators said this information prompted Collins’ family and friends to sell their shares in the company and save over $768,000 in losses. Attorneys for the congressman said in a statement they “are confident he will be completely vindicated and exonerated.”  

A former county executive of Erie County with a history of what the New York Daily News once called a case of “foot-in-mouth disease,” Collins had been expected to easily jaunt to a fourth term in Congress. McMurray said a “conspiracy of silence” had blinded party bigwigs to Collins’ vulnerabilities as a candidate. “The guy’s in the swamp so deep he’s got gills,” McMurray said, “but nobody wants to talk about it.”

Few Democratic kingmakers wanted McMurray in the race in the first place. He said the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee ignored his texts and calls for months, and even after McMurray, who has fielded some criticism for not living within the boundaries of the district, entered the race as Collins’ sole Democratic challenger, Gov. Andrew Cuomo called for him to step down and be replaced by his lieutenant governor, Kathy Hochul. McMurray did not budge from the criticism. “I’m going to use a Sarah Palin line,” he joked during a press conference Wednesday. “I can see NY-27 from my house.” 

The only Democratic official he said gave him any constructive advice was the late Rochester-area lawmaker Louise Slaughter, who he credits with his campaign’s slogan: “Fight like hell.” 

“It was infuriating for months and months because no one was paying attention,” he said. “I felt like Paul Revere.”

The Democratic political apparatus is paying attention now. On Wednesday morning, around the same time Cook Political Report changed the 27th District from “solid” to “likely” Republican, a DCCC staffer finally called McMurray. “‘You were literally on our Rolodex for this morning,'” McMurray recalled the staffer saying, “‘so it’s fortuitous that all of this happened at the same time.'”  He did not exactly believe that the timing was a “fortuitous” as the staffer had suggested. 

But McMurray, who will need far more than the $133,975 he has raised so far to oust Collins, will accept all the help he can get. First on his agenda is professionalizing his nascent campaign operation. His thin roster of staffers includes an aide who had been working at a liquor store and a photographer McMurray scooped up after meeting him at a rally. “I think we gave him some title like ‘deputy campaign manager,’ ” McMurray said. “I think the oldest person on my campaign is 28.” 

“I’ve labeled us the ‘Bad News Bears’ of politics,” he added. “We’re scrappy and scruffy, but we’re getting it done.” 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate