Anxiety Is Like Having an “Improv Group in Your Brain”

Aparna Nancherla has turned her struggles with mental health into some of the year’s best comedy.

Shaughn & John

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Aparna Nancherla is a comedian who also happens to be an introvert grappling with depression: “A lot of people have a fear of missing out,” she jokes. “I have a fear of missing in.” Petite and in her mid-30s, she has been performing for more than a decade, but suddenly she’s everywhere, with quirky guest roles on Crashing, Master of None, Inside Amy Schumer, and BoJack Horseman. Last January, she landed her first starring role, on Comedy Central’s Corporate, where she plays a weary human resources manager. Two months later, Netflix devoted an episode of its series The Standups to her off-kilter comedy—a set that covered clown emojis and texts from her South Indian immigrant parents. In November, she appeared in Paul Feig’s A Simple Favor, and announced that she’ll be part of an all-Indian cast for Mira, Royal Detective, a new Disney Junior show premiering in 2020.

Nancherla can very much relate to the oddball characters she inhabits, she tells me after her set at an immigrant rights fundraiser in San Francisco: “I’ve always had an affinity toward people who are a little bit outside the group.”

Mother Jones: How do you decide which parts of your life to joke about?

Aparna Nancherla: It started out very observational: Here are things that happened to me, and I’m just going to talk about them. But in the past few years, I’ve started talking more openly about mental health stuff. I was struggling with depression; I was having trouble writing. I did it on stage because I was like, well, I haven’t really written anything else.

MJ: Is it therapeutic?

AN: Sometimes I’m like, are you overindulging? Are you making it worse by thinking about it all the time—or better by trying to find ways to analogize it? I think overall, to frame it in a humorous way helps me to make sense of it. I did a joke about how anxiety is like there’s an improv group in your brain—an improv group that’s too edgy.

MJ: What were things like for you growing up?

AN: I was pretty introverted and also pretty sheltered. My parents kept close tabs on my older sister and me. For a long time we weren’t allowed to go on sleepovers, we weren’t allowed to date—my sister broke down a lot of the barriers. My mom made us take public speaking classes when we were younger, and [at a contest] I did this speech on Bollywood movies and how there needed to be better quality control. My speech was funny, and everyone else went for more serious topics. I ended up winning. That was the first time I was like, “Oh, humor can be used to engage people.”

MJ: What were your career aspirations?

AN: I actually ended up majoring in psychology in college. After I graduated, I interned in DC at NPR and worked at a trade magazine. At night, I was doing open mics and taking improv classes and trying to figure out if comedy was something I could do full time. I moved to LA four and a half years after I started in DC. That was the official quit-the-day-job and try to make a serious go of stand-up.

MJ: What did your parents think?

AN: They’ve always been very supportive. I think they were worried because they were like, “Oh, you’re quitting your job?” They’re not that tapped into pop culture and entertainment. A lot of times they’ll learn about something I did from their friend who will be like, “We saw your daughter on this thing.”

MJ: Yeah, my Thai parents don’t really know what I do, either.

AN: It’s kind of nice, because then this isn’t the be-all and end-all.

MJ: Can you recall your first successful show?

AN: There was this NBC diversity talent search for comedians who were outside of the box of the typical straight white guy categories. I auditioned and got chosen.

MJ: What did you perform?

AN: It was a joke about being a brown person: You can be so many different ethnicities when you’re a brown person—it’s just sort of lumped into this one category. I didn’t talk about identity a lot when I was starting as a comedian. But I did have that one joke.

MJ: Do you ever feel pigeonholed because you’re a woman of color doing comedy?

AN: When I started, comedy was still dominated by straight white men. People would be like, “Oh, I like that you don’t talk about being a woman of color.” At first, I was like, “Oh yeah, that’s good.” Then later I saw it for what it was: They didn’t want you to talk about how you’re different. But you should be allowed—it should be okay to make audiences have to think about experiences other than their own.

MJ: What were some shows that really didn’t work?

AN: It is a job where you fail pretty regularly. I did a set two weeks ago at a pizza shop in Brooklyn, and it was going so bad—but also the mic started malfunctioning. I had to do my set without the mic. You just have to try to roll with the punches. But there’s something freeing about the fact that even when you get a certain level of success or perceived stability, it still can be so bad.

MJ: How would you characterize your approach?

AN: Somebody once described my comedy as thoughtful goofiness. I think that’s a good way to describe it—there’s a silliness, but it’s someone who might overanalyze a lot.

MJ: You did a satirical web series called Womanhood with Jo Firestone. What’s your favorite part about actual womanhood?

AN: I do feel like the older I get, the more comfortable I get in my skin. But part of that is also just getting comfortable with being uncomfortable. When I was younger, I thought when you get older you’ll get all the answers. The older I get, the more I’m okay with just being like, I don’t know the answers, and that’s okay.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate