“Infuriating,” “Devastating,” and “Absolute Madness”—Readers React to the Kavanaugh Hearing

“For many women, this is personal and gut-wrenching.”

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is sworn in before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Tom Williams/Pool Image/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Thursday’s historic hearing with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser, Palo Alto University professor Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, was emotional and contentious: Ford stood by her claims that Kavanaugh assaulted her in high school, while the nominee continued to categorically deny Ford’s allegations as well as several others—at moments interrupting several senators and visibly bursting with anger during questioning. 

As the hearings progressed, we asked Mother Jones readers how they were responding to the testimonies. Here’s a selection of these responses, lightly edited for length and clarity. 

On Ford’s testimony—and the painful feelings it brought up 

“I have not been able to watch any of it at all. My anger and frustration at the entire fiasco is boiling over. I believe the victims. I have worked with survivors of sexual assault and incest and understand how often they have no voice and live in fear of exactly what has happened to these women. The GOP has no soul. There is absolutely no reason why they couldn’t have chosen to dismiss his nomination and choose someone else who does not have this potential issue hanging over their heads. Instead, they are most likely going to ram through his confirmation without having access to all the facts.”—Terry Major-Holliday 

“As a survivor of sexual violence, this hearing has been infuriating, devastating, and has me at the edge of my seat. I haven’t looked away, despite the anxiety and memories it has brought up. My biggest concern is the potential for the development of a partisan divide in the way victims of sexual assault are treated, in and out of the national spotlight.”—Anonymous

“I can’t stand to watch the hearing today. I keep seeing posts and statuses advocating watching and being a sympathetic audience for Dr. Ford, but too much of her story reminds me of my own. The questions being volleyed at her are exactly the ones I feared when I didn’t report my own assault. Looking at social media today has been an emotional minefield—I know better than to read the comments sections of politically charged posts, but I can’t resist. It’s like picking at a scab. I know what I’ll read will leave a pit in my stomach that will linger for days, but I can’t stop myself. This is what my country thinks of me and every other woman who has been assaulted.”—Anonymous

“I’m in tears, as I have been off and on for the past week. For many women, this is personal and gut-wrenching. Then to see Kavanaugh display an angry, aggressive, and at times disdainful demeanor after Ford was thoughtful and circumspect, it brings home how little women are respected and how little progress we’ve made. Who gets to be angry? The perpetrator?”—Cindy

On Kavanaugh’s conduct

“Kavanaugh has conducted himself in a manner that shows he does not have the temperament for a position on the Supreme Court. His angry, defensive, and conspiracy-ridden accusations are not befitting of such a high position.”—Maryann O’Connell

“It is disarming to see a seasoned litigator act so belligerently and a woman who has been assaulted act with such class and dignity. If I had any thought Kavanaugh might have been mistaken for someone else, his rage, out-of-control hissy fit, and disrespect for the process leaves him ineligible in my mind for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land. I am saddened by what has taken place, and irrespective of the fact that Sen. Feinstein respected the victim’s wishes, the Republican Party is complicit in the degradation of our democracy. A very sad day for our country.—Rosemary Reichard 

“Kavanaugh seems to view himself as a victim. A Supreme Court judge faces many challenges (including personal ones) that would preclude having such thin skin. He has every right to defend himself against accusers. But his behavior today certainly did not seem “judicial”…and such blatant partisanship and blame-shifting should certainly be a red flag about how impartial he could be as a judge on our highest court.”—Anonymous 

“Judge Kavanaugh is abhorrent, but it’s completely unfair to judge a person on something that happened when he or she was still in high school. People don’t change much, but they do change. Hormones recede. People mature and become humiliated at their behavior as a teenager. As Richard Nixon did, Mr. Kavanaugh has compounded whatever he’s done by denying he’s done it, despite the evidence. The greatest reasons to oppose his nomination are his misreading of the Constitution and his past decisions.”—Anonymous

Hear more voices discussing how survivors are moving forward on the Mother Jones Podcast:

On the hearing itself

“Very saddened by this spectacle. What has happened to our beloved country? I’m sick of the partisanship. How will anything ever move forward? Please, please, let’s stop all the hatred between these parties.”—Anonymous

“Haven’t been able to watch—my thinking is it should never have gotten this far. Kavanaugh’s record as a judge, his writings and speeches, should have already disqualified him. He has shown he is an ideologue, not somebody who would be fair and impartial. While the present hearings are very important, let’s not forget everything else that was already out there.”—John Doucette

“Unfortunately, I did not hear Judge Kavanaugh’s remarks, but judging by the reporting I have read so far, he calls into question his judgment and integrity. He seems to have taken lessons from Trump. What is also apparent is many of the threats received by both Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh and those who sent them are totally outside the realm of acceptable. In fact, they demean both sides. This behavior is not okay.”—L. Minsky

“I feel now is the time to redefine what “masculinity” is. What I saw during Dr. Ford’s testimony was heartbreaking, but also inspiring and a little bit liberating for my self-loathing. The second half of the “show” reminded me how out of touch we teach men to be in this world from the moment they enter it. I was too young to understand everything going on during Clarence Thomas’ appointment, but couldn’t believe it then. This is absolute madness.”—Brian

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate