Mississippi’s Absentee Ballot Deadline Is Nearly Impossible for Many Voters to Meet

A civil rights group is suing the state ahead of Tuesday’s Senate runoff election.

Democrat Mike Espy and Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith debate last week ahead of Tuesday's runoff.Rogelio V. Solis/ AP Pool, File

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Update, November 27, 4:30 p.m.: A federal judge on Tuesday denied the request to accept absentee ballots that arrived after Monday’s 5 p.m. deadline in Mississippi’s runoff election Tuesday. Though Judge Daniel Jordan III acknowledged that Mississippi’s deadline for requesting, receiving, and returning an absentee ballot “is tight—if not impossible—for some voters,” he concluded that it is too late in the process to extend the deadline.

Ahead of Mississippi’s runoff election for US Senate on Tuesday, a national civil rights group has sued the state’s governor and top election officials over stringent absentee ballot requirements that make it impossible for many voters to have their ballots counted.

Republican incumbent Cindy Hyde-Smith and Democrat Mike Espy both failed to secure a majority in the November 6 election, triggering a runoff. But Mississippi county election officials didn’t begin sending absentee ballots out until Saturday, November 17, according to the lawsuit from the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Many out-of-state voters received those ballots around Thanksgiving. Under Mississippi law, an absentee ballot must be notarized and received by county election officials by 5 p.m. on the day before Election Day. A voter who didn’t receive his ballot until November 23, the day after Thanksgiving, would have had just three days—and one weekday—to get his ballot notarized, put it in the mail, and have it delivered to the county office. 

“Mississippi’s absentee ballot procedures stand out as some of the most burdensome in this country,” lawyers with the Lawyers’ Committee argued in their complaint, filed in federal court in Mississippi last week.* The burdens, they said, go so far as to violate the Constitution.

The Lawyers Committee is representing three Mississippi voters who requested absentee ballots but did not receive them by November 20, making it nearly impossible to get them back in time to be counted. The lawsuit asks a federal judge to force Mississippi officials to count all absentee ballots that are postmarked by Election Day, so that voters whose ballots do not reach officials by Monday’s arrive-by deadline can still have a say in the election.

Voting by mail in Mississippi is uniquely onerous. Many states allow anyone to vote absentee in order to avoid going to the polls, but in Mississippi, only some voters qualify to vote absentee, including voters who will be temporarily out of town or who attend school in another county or state. These voters must request an absentee ballot from their county’s circuit clerk, in person or by mail on an official paper application. For every new election, a new request must be made, including for the runoff. That means that a college student who wants to vote absentee must first request an absentee ballot application, which must be filled out, notarized, and mailed back. Then the ballot must be also notarized before it can be sent back. Notaries can be difficult to find, particularly on a holiday weekend, and they sometimes charge for the services, even though it’s unconstitutional for states to require people to pay in order to vote. For an absentee voter to cast a ballot in Mississippi’s general and runoff elections this year, he or she would have had to notarize and mail four separate documents to the county clerk’s office.

“This burdensome process is difficult to navigate in the best of circumstances,” the Lawyers’ Committee stated in its complaint. “When compounding circumstances—such as an inability to pay for or find notary services, or a delay in postal delivery—add further complications, it becomes impossible.”

In the lawsuit, the Lawyers’ Committee asks a federal judge to loosen some of these requirements so that voters can download and electronically submit an absentee application form for future elections. It also seeks to relax the notary requirements and to force the secretary of state and governor to update the state’s website to make absentee voting instructions clearer.

Correction: An earlier version of this article misstated the date when the lawsuit was filed.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate