The Death Penalty May Be on the Decline, But It’s Still Really Racist

Two new reports show the inequities.

oneword/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Use of the death penalty is still declining in every state, but two new reports from the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) and the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (TCADP) show that while executions and death sentences have decreased in the last quarter-century, inequalities that have been a part of the death penalty system have held steady.

An October Gallup poll found that the percentage of Americans who would like to see the death penalty imposed more frequently has declined by 2 percentage points since 2017, when the last survey was conducted. “Even in the face of inflammatory political rhetoric urging its expanded use, voters showed that the death penalty is no longer a political wedge issue,” Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, said in a statement. New death sentences and executions remained near historic lows. In 2018, 25 people were executed, a slight uptick from the 23 executions carried out in 2017.

But while the same poll found that nearly half of Americans believe the death penalty is applied fairly, in fact, the new studies show that the death penalty system is rife with inequalities. The US Supreme Court ruled in 1986 that the severely mentally ill cannot be executed, but it’s up to states to decide exactly how to interpret the ruling. According to the DPIC report, of the 25 people executed in 2018, 18 of them suffered from one or more impairments such as significant evidence of mental illness, evidence of a brain injury or intellectual disability, or chronic childhood trauma.

The racial bias also appears to have gotten worse in some regions. “While use of the death penalty is declining in Texas as it is in the rest of the country, the system itself is still plagued by racial bias and unfairness,” Kristin Houle, executive director of the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, tells Mother Jones. According to the coalition’s report, which was released Friday, even though new death sentences are rapidly declining in the Lone Star State, 13 of those executed in the United States in 2018 were Texas death row inmates. In 2018, all seven of the men sentenced to death in Texas are people of color.

The report reveals that between 2014 and 2018, Texas handed down 28 death sentences, and 20 of the defendants belonged to a minority race. In counties where district attorneys seek capital punishment most frequently, the racial disparities are “particularly stark for African American defendants,” Houle says. In Harris County, home to Houston, for example, 15 of the last 19 people sentenced to death are black men, three are Latino, and one identifies with a different race. The last white person sentenced to death in Harris County was Anthony Shore in 2004.

In Dallas and Tarrant counties, which the Dallas-Fort Worth area straddle, all 10 of the men sentenced to death since 2012 are black. According to the TCADP report, while black men comprise only 12.6 percent of the population, they make up 44.2 percent of condemned inmates.

Racial disparities can also be found in clemency proceedings. In 2003, Thomas Whitaker, a 38-year-old white man, arranged to have his family murdered in order to obtain a $1 million inheritance, but his father survived the attack. Four years later, Whitaker was convicted of the crime and sentenced to death, but a few days before his February execution, his father begged the state to spare him. In a rare move, the Texas Board of Parole unanimously granted Whitaker clemency and sentenced him to spend the rest of his life in prison. A few months later, Christopher Young, a 34-year-old black man convicted of murdering a store owner during a robbery in 2004, appealed to the parole board. Like Whitaker, he too was well-behaved in prison, and the victim’s son pleaded for his life. However, Young was denied clemency, and was put to death in July. His lawyers argued that race was a big factor in the parole board’s decision.

“The racial disparities infect every aspect of the capital punishment system,” Houle says. In fact, in 2018, Washington became the 20th state to abolish the death penalty, citing racial bias. The state’s justices said they are “confident that the association between race and the death penalty is not attributed to random chance.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate