Kamala Harris Teams Up With AOC to Fight Housing Discrimination

Their bill would remove barriers for people with criminal records.

Gerald Herbert/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Wednesday, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) are introducing a bill that would help formerly incarcerated people secure government housing assistance. 

“Too many people become involved in our criminal justice system and serve their time only to return home to face additional barriers to employment, education, and housing,” said Harris in a statement. “By requiring a higher standard of evidence and a more holistic review process, we are taking a significant step toward giving Americans a fair chance to succeed.” 

Lack of access to housing is one of the main causes of recidivism—when a formerly incarcerated person returns to prison or jail. Because many landlords refuse to rent to those with criminal records and also because of stringent rules in government assisted homes, one in five people who leave prison will end up homeless

“The Fair Chance at Housing Act of 2019” would reform the current eviction and screening policies for housing that are currently in place. As part of the War on Drugs from the 1990s, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which oversees local public housing authorities, issued guidance that compelled local public housing authorities to adopt extremely strict policies regarding criminal activity. This bill takes aim at eliminating those rules.

The proposed legislation attempts to reverse a number of policies that public housing residents and advocates have long said are unfair to those attempting to rebuild their lives after living prison, and that have imposed a burden on families with a member who has a criminal record. It would ban “one-strike” policies that allow landlords to evict tenants for violating the law, no matter how minor the infraction might be. It also gets rid of what are described as “no-fault policies,” through which it is possible for an entire family to be evicted for criminal activity by a guest or household member, even if no one else was aware of that activity. During a House Financial Services Committee hearing in May, Ocasio-Cortez asked HUD Secretary Ben Carson if he supported changing those specific policies, and he appeared to support the idea.

Should the measure become law, those tenants who are evicted for criminal activity would be guaranteed adequate written notice of the decision as well as the chance to appeal, neither of which they currently are able to do. Finally, public housing authorities would be prohibited from randomly drug and alcohol testing tenants when there is no reason to suspect a problem.  

For Harris, the proposed legislation comes at a time when the presidential candidate wants to prove that she’s got the progressive chops to be the Democratic nominee. Since she announced her candidacy, Harris has been disparaged for her past as a prosecutor, as Mother Jones’ Jamilah King reported

This criticism was especially pronounced during Harris’ tenure as California attorney general, when she supported laws punishing parents when their children are chronically truant. She was also hammered for prosecuting Backpage.com—some say to the detriment of sex workers—and slammed for being cautious on a host of other matters, including not prosecuting now-Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin for foreclosure violations stemming from his time as CEO of OneWest Bank.

Throughout her candidacy, Harris has faced the “Kamala is a cop” taunt. Even after going head-to-head with front-runner Joe Biden during night two of the Democratic debates (and winning), observers still wondered how her tough-on-crime past might undermine her chances to become a frontrunner. Harris has pushed back, referring to herself as a progressive prosecutor, and pairing up with Ocasio-Cortez on this type of legislation might help convince others of her support for the rights of those who have served their time. 

As with many of the policies borne out of the War on Drugs, the ones that target people with criminal records disproportionately affect people of color. Black and white people use drugs at similar rates, but the imprisonment rate for black people is nearly six times higher than that of white people. “This legislation is one of many steps that need to be taken to repair our broken criminal justice system,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “The denial of basic necessities to formerly incarcerated people does not make our communities safer.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate