August 1, 2019

Progressive Activists Say Cory Booker Won Wednesday’s Debate

A flash poll by the activist group Indivisible put the New Jersey senator on top.

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) takes questions from reporters after Wednesday's Democratic debate in Detroit.Carlos Osorio/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Cory Booker was the clear winner of Wednesday night’s Democratic presidential debate, according to members of the progressive activist group Indivisible.

Indivisible conducted a flash poll via text message at the end of the party’s debates on Tuesday and Wednesday, asking thousands of members which candidate impressed them the most. Twenty-four percent of the more than 4,700 respondents on Wednesday said they were most impressed by Booker, the New Jersey senator. Sen. Kamala Harris of California, former Vice President Joe Biden, and former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro garnered 19, 14, and 11 percent of the vote, respectively. No other candidates received more than 10 percent of the vote.

On Tuesday, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren was the runaway favorite in Indivisible’s flash poll, winning 52 percent of the vote.

Booker outdid his previous performance among Indivisible members during the first Democratic debates in Miami last month. Then, Booker came in second to Warren. The debate lineups were shuffled between the June and July sessions, so it’s hard to make an apples-to-apples comparison. But Booker’s performance against Harris—who shared the stage with Booker in June and won 65 percent of that debate’s Indivisible vote—represents a shift.

Booker’s breakout moment came in the midst of a boxing match between Biden and Harris over their health care positions. Biden accused Harris of being impractical as she described her vision for a single-payer system that reserved a limited role for private insurance; Harris slammed the former vice president for not going far enough to hold insurance companies accountable. As they went round after round, Booker made this point. “Let me just say that the person that’s enjoying this debate most right now is Donald Trump, as we pit Democrats against each other, while he is working right now to take away Americans’ health care,” Booker said. (Booker did not back a Medicare-for-All plan, promising a system that preserves’ Americans existing private insurance coverage.) “But this pitting progressives against moderates, saying one is unrealistic and the other doesn’t care enough, that to me is dividing our party and demoralizing us in face of the real enemy here.”

That moment perhaps explains Booker’s surge among Indivisible members. The organization often backs the boldest items on the progressive wishlist, such as single-payer health care, and Booker has shied away from supporting that and other far-left positions on the campaign trail. But Indivisible’s raison d’être, above all else, is to defeat Trump in 2020, and on Wednesday night’s debate stage, Booker signaled he shared its sense of urgency. 

Indivisible, which was founded in 2017, counts more than 1 million members across the country, most of whom are women.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate