Debate on DADT Blocked in Senate

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The effort to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” the controversial policy barring gays from serving openly in the military, was dealt a blow Tuesday as Democratic leadership failed to get the 60 votes needed to move forward to debate on a bill that would overturn the 17-year-old ban. Both sides walked away accusing the other of playing politics on the issue.

The vote on whether to proceed to debate of the defense authorization bill, which includes both the DADT repeal and the DREAM Act, a measure that would create a path to citizenship for immigrants who pursue higher education or a career in the military, failed with a 56-43 vote. Arkansas Democrats Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor voted with the entire bloc of Republicans against moving forward to debate on the package.

In remarks following the vote, both sides traded barbs accusing the other of playing politics with the defense authorization bill. “I am disappointed that my Republican colleagues put partisan politics ahead of the best interests of the men and women who courageously defend our nation,” said Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) in a statement.

Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) held a press conference following the vote to blast the proposed changes. Graham argued that dropping these changes on the military while the nation is involved in two wars is “unfair,” and accused Democrats of trying “to make political points 40-something days before the election” with those both amendments. “Whether Lady Gaga likes it or not is not of great concern to me,” said Graham, referring of course to the pop star’s effort to rally support for overturning the policy.

McCain also accused Democrats of only trying to “energize the gay and lesbian vote” before a major election. He has said previously that he believes a survey that the Department of Defense is conducting on the impact a repeal would have on the military should be completed before the policy is repealed. But on Tuesday, he also voiced concerns with the survey itself and whether the survey itself adequately addresses concerns about the policy.

Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, called today’s vote “a frustrating blow to repeal this horrible law,” one that put service men and women in the middle of partisan wrangling. “We lost because of the political maneuvering dictated by the mid-term elections,” said Sarvis. “Let’s be clear: Opponents to repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ did not have the votes to strike those provisions from the bill. Instead, they had the votes for delay.”

Sarvis said opponents of the measure would now look to a lame duck session after the election for repeal, but acknowledged that even then it “will have a slim shot.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate