The US Special Envoy for Haiti Just Resigned Over the “Inhumane” Treatment of Haitian Migrants

“Surging migration to our borders will only grow as we add to Haiti’s unacceptable misery.”

A child and adult cross last week through through the Rio Grande River from Ciudad AcuƱa, Mexico toward Del Rio, Texas.Marie D. De JesĆŗs/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In July, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken announced that Ambassador Daniel Foote, a career diplomat, would serve as Special Envoy for Haiti following the assassination of President Jovenel MoĆÆse. Two months later, Foote is resigning in protest of the Biden administrationā€™s decision to summarily expel more than 1,000 Haitians from the United States under a Trump-era border policy. 

ā€œWith deep disappointment and apologies to those seeking crucial changes, I resign from my position as Special Envoy for Haiti, effective immediately,ā€  Foote wrote in a resignation letter obtained by Yamiche Alcindor of PBS News. ā€œI will not be associated with the United States [sic] inhumane, counterproductive decision to deport thousands of Haitian refugees and illegal immigrants to Haiti, a country where American officials are confined to secure compounds because of the danger posed by armed gangs in control of daily life.ā€

Footeā€™s decision comes after more than 10,000 Haitian migrants arrived at a border crossing in Del Rio, Texas. Under US law, they would normally be allowed to enter the United States and request asylum. Their claims would then be evaluated by asylum officers and immigration judges. 

But the Trump administration upended that framework during the pandemic by invoking a public health policy, known as Title 42, to immediately expel migrants and asylum seekers from the country without any semblance of the due process that (often only theoretically) existed before. (The policy was not actually supported by US public health officials.) Instead, Stephen Miller, Trumpā€™s top immigration adviser, pushed it through as part of his longstanding white nationalist agenda.

Now the Biden administration is using that same policy to expel Haitians, along with migrants from other countries. Since Sunday, the Department of Homeland Security has sent more than 1,400 Haitians from Texas to Haiti on 12 expulsion flights. Many of the people being sent to Haiti had fled the country before MoĆÆseā€™s death and the recent 7.2-magnitude earthquake. Theyā€™d been living and working in Latin America, but were reportedly hopeful that theyā€™d finally be allowed into the United States with Biden in office. 

Last week, federal judge Emmet Sullivan ruled that DHS cannot use Title 42 to expel migrant families with children. But Sullivan paused his order for two weeks to give the Biden administration time to put it in place. The Justice Department is now appealing the decision. Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLUā€™s Immigrantsā€™ Rights Project, said in a statement, ā€œRather than appeal the ruling, the administration should instead acknowledge that the court was correct to find Title 42 unlawful, and end the program entirely.ā€

Foote joined the Foreign Service in 1998, according to his LinkedIn profile. He served as the deputy chief of mission in Haiti in the early aughts, but his current assignment proved to be more than he could bear. As he wrote in his resignation letter to Blinken:

The people of Haiti, mired in poverty hostage to the terror, kidnappings, robberies and massacres of armed gangs and suffering under a corrupt government with gang alliances, simply cannot support the forced infusion of thousands of returned migrants lacking food, shelter, and money without additional, avoidable human tragedy. The collapsed state is unable to provide security or basic services, and more refugees will fuel further desperation and crime. Surging migration to our borders will only grow as we add to Haitiā€™s unacceptable misery.

He is not alone in his discontent within the administration. One official at US Citizenship and Immigration Services, the DHS agency that handles many asylum claims, along with other forms of legal immigration, told Reuters they were ā€œpersonally mortifiedā€ by the recent expulsions.

ā€œItā€™s appalling, disgusting,ā€ said another. ā€œWhat do they believe in, if this is acceptable?ā€

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate