6 Revealing Moments From Our Profile of GOP Senate Candidate Blake Masters

A regretful donor, a private chat server, a college rap video, and more.

Mother Jones illustration; Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Monday, Mother Jones published a profile of US Senate candidate Blake Masters, the 35-year-old protĆ©gĆ© of PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel. Masters, who rose from being Thielā€™s student at Stanford to his chief of staff, is now the frontrunner in the Arizona Republican primary thanks to Donald Trumpā€™s endorsement. If Masters wins the August 2 primary, he will face Mark Kelly, one of the Senateā€™s most vulnerable Democrats.

Masters is a highly unusual candidate who used to consider himself a libertarian. He supported open borders, backed a womanā€™s right to choose, and denounced nationalism. A decade later, he is running as an America First ally of Tucker Carlson. 

More fundamentally, Masters is the right-hand man of a billionaire who confessed in 2009, ā€œI no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.ā€ Instead of disrupting taxi companies or hotels with his investments, Thiel now has his sights on American democracy. He is spending tens of millions of dollars backing Masters, as well as Ohio Senate candidate JD Vance, another former employee. He is also putting smaller sums behind more than a dozen Republican candidates, most of whom question the results of the 2020 election. His goal is to bend the American right to his will.

The story is based on interviews with more a dozen people who have known Masters over the years (including the best man at his wedding and three former roommates), articles found in the archive of his private high school, emails from Masters obtained by Mother Jones, screenshots from a private chat server used by some of Mastersā€™ biggest donors, and conversations with experts on Thielā€™s heterodox worldview and the thinkers that have shaped it. The Masters campaign did not respond to interview or fact-checking requests sent as far back as March 22. Thiel did not respond to requests for comment, either.

Below are six things we uncovered in our investigation. Read the full article with much, much more here.

One of Mastersā€™ own donors now regrets his donation.

As I reported in the piece, a tech worker who donated to Masters campaign now deeply regrets supporting Masters:

ā€œThis is the first time where I will regularly wake up and feel just a sense of dread about who it is that I have backed,ā€ the tech worker says.

On a private chat server, supporters boasted about an article headlined “Blake Masters Blames Gun Violence on ‘Black People, Frankly.'”

Screenshots shared with Mother Jones provide a window into how some of Mastersā€™ biggest backers talk about the candidate in private. In June, one donor shared an article headlined, ā€œBlake Masters Blames Gun Violence on ā€˜Black People, Frankly.ā€™ā€ Using internet slang, he asked approvingly, ā€œHow can one man be so [b]ased?ā€ Another user whose avatar was an NFT valued at roughly $100,000 replied, ā€œI love it when a candidate says what weā€™re all thinking.ā€

Before calling for overturning Roe v. Wade, Masters criticized the NRA for opposing a womanā€™s right to choose.

After graduating from Stanford in 2008, Masters wrote to a listserv used by members of Columbae, the left-wing, vegetarian co-op he belonged during his college years. ā€œWhen will someone start a group thatā€™s pro-gun (pro-freedom) AND pro-choice (pro-freedom)?ā€ Masters wrote in opposition to the NRA. ā€œI would join.ā€

The Masters campaign declined to say when Masters stopped being pro-choice.

As a senior at Stanford, Masters rapped while wearing what was meant to resemble Native American war paint.

Masters recorded the video for a talent show organized by the Columbae co-op. Masters took aim at political correctness. ā€œIā€™ve got the war paint on, as you can see,ā€ he rapped. ā€œWho said what about cultural insensitivity?”

A decade ago, Masters was recommending the writing of a self-identified ā€œabsolute monarchistā€ whose work he has now quoted on the campaign trail

In 2012, according to an email shared with Mother Jones, Masters suggested that a former college roommate read a series of essays by Curtis Yarvin, who describes himself as Americaā€™s foremost absolute monarchist blogger, that called for replacing democracy with a monarchy headed by a CEO. The roommate had asked for ideas for a book club focused on issues like sustainability and overconsumption, but Masters thought that was a distraction from deeper problems like the ā€œsustainability of sovereigntyā€ and government spending.

A decade later, Masters talked up Yarvin’s plan to “RAGE,” or Retire All Government Employees, on the campaign trail. Yarvin recently gave Masters his first campaign contribution on record: the legal maximum of $5,800. 

Some of Mastersā€™ childhood best friends have been disgusted by his rhetoric.

Noah Gustafson, one of his best friends from high school, has been struck by Masters’ total lack of empathy. ā€œIt makes me ache when I see what he writes and says,ā€ he said. ā€œIt puts me in a state of depression.ā€

ā€œI don’t know what’s worse,ā€ said Collin Wedel, the best man at his wedding, ā€œif he actually is aware that he’s selling snake oil to people, or if he truly believesā€ what heā€™s saying.

In November, Masters shared a private tweet Wedel sent criticizing him. As a result, Wedel received harassing calls and had to call the police after threatening materials were placed in his mailbox. The two have not spoken since.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate