Health Group Accuses Canadian Gas Association of Greenwashing

Trade group’s claim that methane is “clean” has sparked an official probe.

From the Canadian Gas Association's ad campaign "Fuelling Canada."Photo captured from Fuelling Canada website homepage

This story was originally published by Canada’s National Observer and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

A prominent gas industry lobby group is being investigated by Canada’s Competition Bureau for alleged greenwashing one month after health-care workers raised the alarm over one of its advertising campaigns.

“This is groundbreaking,” said Dr. Melissa Lem, spokesperson for the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE), the group that filed the complaint against the Canadian Gas Association (CGA). ‘It’s the first time that the gas industry is being investigated by the Competition Bureau for misleading claims.”

The Competition Bureau’s decision to open a file, announced by CAPE on November 10, comes just one month after environmentalists successfully applied for the bureau to investigate RBC for allegedly misleading Canadians about its climate performance.

The complaint filed against CGA centers on an ad campaign from last November called “Fuelling Canada,” which presents so-called natural gas as “clean” and “affordable” when, in reality, the gas is mostly made up of a potent greenhouse gas called methane that does more damage to the planet in the short-term than carbon dioxide. The campaign has a website and ran on social media, including Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.

Because methane is 25 to 80 times more powerful at trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide, it is misleading to describe it as “clean,” the complaint argued. It also took issue with ads calling the fuel “affordable” given that heat pumps are generally cheaper to use and gas is expected to become more expensive than other energy options as economies transition to low-carbon options.

If the inquiry confirms CGA’s statements are misleading and false, the association and its member companies—including Enbridge, TC Energy, FortisBC, Énergir, and about a dozen others—would be forced to stop advertising methane gas as “clean” and “affordable,” issue a retraction, and possibly face a $10 million (Canadian) fine, the CAPE press release stated.

In an emailed statement to Canada’s National Observer, CGA’s president and CEO Timothy M. Egan said the association “will co-operate with the Competition Bureau and is confident in its position.”

From the “Fuelling Canada” campaign.

Canadian Gas Association Facebook page

“Natural gas plays an important part in Canada’s energy mix, meeting 38 per cent of Canadians’ energy needs, a number that is growing,” the statement reads. “Canadians need access to energy they can count on, and natural gas meets that need.”

The bureau’s decision to investigate both CGA and RBC indicates increasing scrutiny on fossil-fuel disinformation and net-zero claims but also reveals broader regulation is needed to tackle the scale of this problem, said the CAPE press release.

Greenwashing is also front and center at COP27 thanks to the release of a new UN report outlining what a credible net-zero commitment must look like, so the bureau’s decision “couldn’t have come at a better time,” said Lem.

Canadian doctors and health workers have been leading a crusade against fossil-fuel advertising and have called on the federal government to ban and regulate fossil-fuel advertising—similar to the tobacco industry—given the impacts on air quality and human health.

“These misleading claims, unfortunately, are driving demand,” said Lem. Consumers want to buy products that are affordable and environmentally friendly, and the industry knows this, she added, hence the targeted messaging. The industry has a well-documented history of using its vast resources to deny the existence of climate change. “Now that it’s clear it does (exist) … they’re now switching to the strategy to greenwash instead,” said Lem.

For the world to have a shot at limiting global warming to 1.5 C, Canada and other wealthy fossil-fuel-producing nations must stop all production by 2034, according to a report published in March by the International Institute for Sustainable Development. Contrary to the findings of that report and several others, Canada will continue to increase oil and gas production.

As the industry is doing everything it can to perpetuate demand for fossil fuels, “we have to be smarter than that,” said Lem. “We have to protect consumers by making sure that these misleading claims don’t drive demand.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate