Sarah Palin vs. Cory Booker

Who’s really using social media to transform politics?

Palin: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SarahPalinElon.jpg">Therealbs2002</a>/Wikimedia ; Booker: <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Booker1.jpg">Bbsrock</a>/Wikimedia

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Tankers of ink have been spilled analyzing Sarah Palin’s use of Facebook and Twitter to end-run the “lamestream media” and control her message. That strategy has its downsides, as Palin discovered when she posted an ill-timed and solipsistic video after the Tucson shooting. The resulting “re-re-re-reaction,” as Stephen Colbert put it, prompted Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski to ask, “At what point do we just ignore her?” and Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank to pledge himself to a month of Palin abstinence (February, but still). All in all, though, Palin’s approach has worked well—she’s the queen of what in the political ad biz is known as “free media.”

Meanwhile, another politician is mastering earned media (yes, same thing, but bear with us). Cory Booker, a Rhodes Scholar and Stanford football star, first gained notoriety when he moved into Newark’s notorious Brick Towers after becoming a city council member. Then, in 2002, he tried to oust Sharpe James from his 16-year perch as mayor. Booker, derided as a carpetbagger and “not black enough” by James and his supporters, lost that race, but an Oscar-nominated documentary, Street Fight, brought him wider attention and guaranteed a rematch with the James machine. Still living in Brick Towers, he became mayor in 2006 and quickly lowered the homicide rate by an astonishing 36 percent, and doubled the number of affordable housing units, all while slashing the deficit and raising the salaries of many city workers.

This is remarkable stuff. But what propels Booker into the once-in-a-generation stratum of leaders is how he has enlisted his constituents to fight for a better city—and how he has used social media to do so.

Booker keeps up an awe-inspiring Twitter feed. He fields—and acts upon—complaints about broken streetlights and fire hydrants. He quotes philosophy and Scripture. He reminds Newarkians how to report landlords who don’t turn on the heat. When Jersey Shore “star” Snooki tweeted “Ugh stuck in Nwk traffic is no fun,” he replied, “Snooki! I’m the mayor where R U so I can give u a ticket 4 texting & driving we needs revenue!” He’s also got the city—and followers from around the world—joining his weight-loss efforts via the #letsmove hashtag.

Snooki! I’m the mayor where R U so I can give u a ticket 4 texting & driving we needs revenue! RT @Sn00ki Ugh stuck in Nwk traffic is no funless than a minute ago via web

The white media elite were gobsmacked when the Pew Research Center revealed that the highest penetration of Twitter was in black and Latino communities. But Booker understood that with a text-based technology, the barrier to entry was low and the potential for participation was high—something that consultants had long been lecturing other politicians about, to little avail.

When a massive snowstorm hit the tri-state area, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg lost face for his pokey response. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie caught hell for riding out the storm at Disney World. But Mayor Booker not only responded to pleas to plow certain roads, look in on an aged relative, or bring a desperate mom diapers—he showed up personally, working until 2 or 3 a.m. Not that he didn’t ask his constituents to help out. When TaJuan Bonds told the mayor he had to dig himself out “on bergen & grumman ave,” Booker showed up and tweeted: “Wow u shud b ashamed of yourself. U tweet vulgarities & then I come out here to help & its ur mom & sis digging. Where r u?” (The guy quickly appeared.) Booker was so effective that New Yorkers started pleading for his help: “Hey @CoryBooker if you come plow my street in Brooklyn, I’ll vote for you when you run for President. Bloomberg hasn’t done jack.” And check this tweet from Donald Rumsfeld: “Snow is coming down hard in New Mexico. Joyce says I have to shovel. Told her that Mayor @CoryBooker should be here any minute.” Donald effing Rumsfeld.

Yes, the Obama era fizzled fast. But “Yes We Can” is a message that still resonates with Americans, whether it comes from their mayor, their neighbor, their pastor, or their president.

Okay, so Cory Booker’s a good mayor, who just might be in possession of a time turner. But he didn’t need any more love from the media—he had us at Snooki—so what’s the larger point?

This: As Kevin Drum explains in our cover story, politicians de facto don’t respond to the needs of ordinary people anymore. With unions decimated, there is no longer any institution that can counterbalance the clout of the ultrawealthy.

Two years ago, it seemed like this was about to change. Obama for America moved millions of people to gather across race, class, and generational boundaries. It amassed an email list of 13 million names, 4 million donors, and 8 million people who’d volunteered to actually work for the campaign. Yes, the Obama administration—maddeningly—then proceeded to put its most powerful asset in deep freeze. But the fact remains that “Yes We Can” is a message that still resonates with Americans, whether it comes from their mayor, their neighbor, their pastor, or their president.

Can Populism 2.0 be sustained without the urgency of a presidential race? It remains to be seen, but in the tweets of Cory Booker, in the enthusiasm of his constituents, and in the enduring lessons from the high points of the Obama campaign, there is an inkling of how it might be done.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate