Offshore

<i>Offshore: The Dark Side of the Global Economy</i>, By William Brittain-Catlin. <i>Farrar, Straus and Giroux. $25.</i>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Question: What do Apple Computer, Enron, and Al Qaeda have in common? Answer: They’ve all mastered the art of using offshore money havens to raise funds on the sly, shield their assets, and free themselves from the web of international financial oversight. As former investigator William Brittain-Catlin puts it in this eye-opening book, “In our offshore world, secrecy has become the new freedom,” enabling companies to exist almost as accounting fictions, unbound by the demands of the state.

Offshore centers on the Cayman Islands, long known for its “no questions asked” policies. Here’s how a typical Cayman tax dodge, once used by Apple, worked: An Apple subsidiary in Singapore would build a Mac and “sell” it for $200 to an Apple front company in the Caymans, which then resold it to an American Apple dealer for $1,000. All told, Apple would make $800 in profit, but most of that would go to the front company, which paid no U.S. taxes. (The IRS caught on to this scheme, and in 1994 Apple forked over $114 million—not even half of what it owed.) Enron used a far more intricate array of tricks to hide its misdeeds from the prying eyes of regulators and analysts. With the help of nearly 700 holdings in the Caymans, between 1996 and 2000 it paid only $17 million in taxes on profits of $2 billion.

Nevertheless, even the Enrons can’t move offshore entirely: They still need the feds to provide corporate welfare and bail them out when they’re broke, even as their financial evasions deplete the tax base. Meanwhile, companies that play by the rules are unable to keep up with their tax-evading competitors, creating added incentive to funnel profits into foreign tax havens. After 9/11, the Bush administration realized that Al Qaeda could play the offshore game as well as anyone, and promised to clean up “the dark side” of international finance. But it’s done little to rein in those companies that don’t mind their offshore profits going back to Washington, so long as they end up in the right pockets.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate