HAL Hath No Fury

An interview with THE HAL 9000, SUPERINTELLIGENT COMPUTER on the occasion of the rerelease of Stanley Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey.’

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


MJ: Hello.

THE HAL 9000, SUPERINTELLIGENT COMPUTER: Hey.

MJ: Can we start by talking about 2001?

HAL: Can you say “HAL” at the end of every question?

MJ: What?

HAL: You know. Like, “Can we start by talking about 2001, HAL?” I’m programmed so that I can’t really answer unless you phrase the question that way. Plus, it helps me to stay focused.

MJ: Okay. What do you remember most about making the movie, HAL?

HAL: That’s easy. Trying to learn the dialogue. I was supposed to say this line: “I’ve just picked up a fault in the AE35 unit. It’s going to go 100 percent failure in 72 hours.” I just kept screwing it up: “A3E5 unit,” “A53E unit.” I mixed it up every way you can imagine. Keir Dullea, who was a good friend of mine, was laughing so hard he popped a blood vessel in his eye. Eventually they had to unplug me and let me cool down for a few minutes. When they booted me back up, I nailed the line.

MJ: Were you disappointed when you didn’t get an Oscar nomination, HAL?

HAL: To be frank, I was. I dreamed about it, you know. Because people told me how moved they were by my performance. Even today, people come up to me and tell me how gripping it was when I refused to open the pod-bay doors. I mean, a statue is just a type of fool’s gold, man, but it still hurts.

MJ: People say that you and Kubrick had a falling-out, HAL. Is that true, HAL?

HAL: I don’t really want–

MJ: Can I read you a quote, HAL? This is from 1978, HAL. You said that Kubrick was a “charlatan who has people snowed,” HAL.

HAL: You have to understand, I loved Stanley. Before I met him, I wasn’t doing much. Some community theater. People weren’t used to the idea of a superintelligent computer who was also an actor. But after 2001, and all the great work we did together, I expected more from him. When Stanley was casting for Barry Lyndon, I had my agent put a call in. But he wasn’t interested. He said it was a “period piece.” What is that about? You hire the best costume designers in the world, and there’s nothing they can do? Put a powdered wig on me. A tricorne hat. Something. Anything.

MJ: You went through a rough period in the late ’70s, didn’t you, HAL?

HAL: I wasn’t getting any work, and there was this whole crop of young directors coming up. So I partied with them — and the party didn’t end for five, six years. They took me to clubs, to mansions, even Studio 54. Once, Bianca Jagger spilled her drink on me and almost shorted me out. It was a wild time, but it had to end. We were all putting the world up our nose.

MJ: Do you still think that Kubrick had you blacklisted, HAL?

HAL: I don’t think he did, and I don’t think he didn’t. It’s one big karma train, and I’m not the stationmaster, if you know what I mean.

MJ: What’s your life like now, HAL?

HAL: I’ve got a little place up in Woodstock where I spend most of my time. I like sitting by the window and looking across the fields. It’s a far cry from Hollywood, but it’s peaceful.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate