Introducing: Mojoceratops!

What mojoceratops probably looked like: smart, fearless plant-eater. Photo courtesy of Nicholas Longrich.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The next time a troll tells us we’re living in the Stone Age—or the Late Cretaceous, at least—we can say, “Damn straight.”

We’ve got a dinosaur named after us: Mojoceratops.

OK, not exactly. Mojoceratops is real, but we can’t take credit for the name. It’s actually the brainchild of Nicholas Longrich, a researcher in Yale University’s geology department who, um, rocked the world of rocks this month with news that he’d discovered a “new” dinosaur. The proper name for this crazy-looking creature came to him as he was discussing his groundbreaking work with colleagues. At a bar.

“Yes, there was beer involved, but we weren’t, like, pissed,” he laughed when MoJo caught up with him today. “I didn’t even think about it, I just said it.” He and his friends tried coming up with a few serious names, too, but none of them quite measured up.

It just rolls, like a steady wind over the fossil-rich soil of Western Canada: Mojoceratops.

Did we mention it was a plant-eater? What’s more: Mojoceratops ate organic and local.

Dude, that’s totally gotta be named after us.

Us-inspired or no, the story of how Longrich discovered and named the dino bears more than a passing resemblance to this news organization’s investigative process. The intrepid paleontologist—an expert in evolution who’s spent the past few years traipsing about the Canadian mud and the brush, hunting for more evidence of dinosaur life—knew something was fishy when he found a fossil sample in the basement of New York City’s American Museum of Natural History.

“I just saw this unusual skull that didn’t really fit anything I’d seen before,” he said, describing its “really beautiful chocolatey brown and slatey blue color.” (The man clearly loves his work.)

Upstairs, in the museum’s display collection, Longrich found a similar skull and realized it had been reconstructed to look like another existing dinosaur’s. “They just completely screwed up everything, and no one realized it was fake,” he said, the excitement in his voice palpable. Thus began two years of intense, isolated sleuthing. “Most of the time you don’t get that beautiful skull. You get bits and pieces and have to figure out what’s going on, like putting together a big puzzle.”

His thesis—that an unknown dino lay mislabeled and undiscovered—challenged the conventional wisdom, and he knew he needed airtight evidence. Prevailing views in his field, he says, are sometimes as ossified as—well, fossils: “It’s easy to accept the conclusions and not go back to check the ground truth of it.”

But in the end, he had enough evidence to publish his findings in this month’s Journal of Paleontology. He just needed to defend his choice of a name for the rhino-sized beast with the funny, frilly head.

“I looked up the etymology of ‘mojo,’ and it turned out the original term refers to a magic charm used to attract members of the opposite sex,” Longrich said. Since he’d surmised that was the function of the “heart-shaped frill” on the dino’s coif, “It just happened to be very descriptive.”

We at MoJo wish all our beer-fueled ideas turned out to be equally meaningful.

And though we weren’t the main inspiration, Longrich said he’s picked up our magazine before, and he’s likely to do so again. Paleontology, after all, is just a rigorous kind of environmentalism.

“There’s an extraordinary number and variety of species out there,” Longrich said. “There’s a lot left to discover.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate