Katrina’s Children

Kids displaced by the hurricane shouldn’t be dumped into failing schools.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Article created by The Century Foundation.

While natural disasters are thought of as the quintessential levelers, hitting
rich and poor, and black and white alike, we all now know that government action,
and inaction, have an enormous impact on just who absorbs the brunt of the disaster.
In New Orleans, the government failed the first test of protection, by inadequately
fortifying the city from flooding. It then failed the second test of evacuating
the city, by inadequately providing for the city’s poor and mostly black residents,
who lacked cars to flee and money for hotels. Now, government faces a third
test: how it will handle the schooling of the children who evacuated to other
parts of Louisiana, to neighboring states, and to other parts of the country.

Given all that the children of New Orleans have been through, we ought to do
everything we can to ensure that they receive a high quality education, with
great teachers, active parents, and supportive peers. For the first time in
their lives, thousands of students who had attended struggling high poverty
public schools in New Orleans could be given the opportunity to attend solidly
middle class, high achieving schools. Alternatively, they may be assigned to
the same sort of failing schools they left. Will we take advantage of a unique
opportunity to do well by these children?

On one level, there is encouraging evidence of hospitality, as public and private
schools scrambled to make room for new children. But there are some worrisome
signs as well. The Wall Street Journal reports
today that private schools are opening their doors mostly to sister private
schools. In the Houston area, most of the children of New Orleans will end up
in high-poverty urban schools, rather than in the suburbs, where
better-off students are educated
.

There is a legitimate concern about the capacity of schools to take in large
numbers of new students. But that is what public schools, unlike private schools,
are required to do: take all comers. Under the surface, the real concerns of
parents often center around the economic class of peers. According
to a study
conducted by David Rusk for The Century Foundation, economic
segregation of schools is increasing, with devastating consequences. Although
American public schools are meant to provide equal opportunity to students,
middle class
schools are 24 times as likely
as low income schools to perform at high
academic levels.

The children and families of New Orleans know this all to well. Even before
the hurricane, children in the Orleans Parish school district were in a very
tough situation. New Orleans has often ranked as the nation’s murder capital,
and the schools suffer all the negative effects of poverty. Statewide,
5.7 percent of Louisiana schools were failing to make adequate yearly progress
in 2003-2004; in the Orleans Parish, the figure was 47 percent, eight times
the rate of failure.

Across the country, a growing number of districts have been seeking to address
the problem of economic segregation. From Wake County (Raleigh), North Carolina,
to LaCrosse Wisconsin, to Cambridge, Massachusetts, districts have sought to
reduce the concentrations of poverty, with
very favorable results for students
. Low income children do much better
in middle class schools; in fact, low income students in middle class schools
do better academically than middle class students in low income schools.

If any set of children has purchase on the nation’s conscience, it is the
children of New Orleans who have experienced things no children should have
to go through. They should not now be relocated to high poverty schools that
are plagued by failure. They are citizens not only of New Orleans, but of the
United States, and deserve to be welcomed into America’s middle class schools.
This is a test the government must pass.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate