The Doggie Bag Dilemma

Practical values

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


LATELY, THE POLITICS OF MEALTIME have gotten complicated enough that even those of us with strong stomachs are struggling to maintain our appetites. Between debates over organic produce, factory farms, and who is responsible for the obesity epidemic, it is hard to sit down to a good meal without eventually facing some confounding ethical dilemmas. Yet when we step out for dinner, or just a quick cup of coffee, many of us set aside our deepest convictions; I’ve seen card-carrying PETA members cheerfully order milk-fed veal in restaurants, a treat they would never indulge in at home. But as a conservationist and would-be foodie, my latest gut check was sparked by stats on packaging waste.

Diners on the run generate more than 1.8 million tons of quick-serve food packaging in the United States each year. The ravages include hamburger wrappers and the insulated cups that carry all those lattes to go. Still, as a guy who brings his own canvas shopping bags to avoid the supermarket dilemma that plagues vegans and omnivores alike—”Paper or plastic?”—I’m surprised how long it took me to realize that restaurant doggie bags and to-go boxes pose a serious problem. Moreover, the fix calls for more than just recyclable foil swans. Most to-go waste finds its way into landfills, and energy hawks worry about the cost of producing and disposing of paper-based containers, such as pizza boxes, while other concerned citizens fret over the carcinogenic fallout from chlorine and polystyrene, a petroleum-derived material commonly encountered in Styrofoam containers.

But change is in the air. This spring Starbucks rolled out coffee cups made from paper that contains 10 percent recycled post-consumer fiber. Though critics would like to see that percentage improved, the new cups will save about 11,000 tons of wood and 47 million gallons of wastewater annually. “It’s a significant step forward,” says Victoria Mills of Environmental Defense, who worked with Starbucks on the initiative. “It also clears a hurdle for any other café or other companies to do the same.” Environmental Defense also helped McDonald’s replace its iconic Styrofoam “clamshell” cases in 1991—the company now wraps its sandwiches in paper—and other fast-food restaurants were quick to follow. Currently, about a third of McDonald’s paper-based packaging is made from recycled paper, and in Europe the chain is working with suppliers on sustainable forestry practices, a policy the company is looking at implementing globally. Such policies can have a profound impact beyond the drive-through. For example, Starbucks had to persuade the Food and Drug Administration to approve food-serving vessels that contain post-consumer paper waste, and the Mississippi River Corp., which supplies pulp for Starbucks’ cups, now makes its wares available to other businesses.

In the same vein, a variety of public and private groups from Berkeley to Boston are working to remove obstacles so more restaurant owners can go green. For instance, the Green Restaurant Association (GRA), the nonprofit brainchild of activist Michael Oshman, consults with restaurants and certifies those that embrace energy conservation, employee education, and recycling efforts. In the long run, Oshman expects responsive restaurants will buy into a “zero-waste” program that emphasizes composting and recycling while finding substitutes for paper products made from virgin pulp or that require chlorine bleaching. When it comes to Styrofoam, Oshman is adamant that restaurants ditch it; the use of polystyrene food packaging is a barrier to GRA certification.” In terms of packaging, it’s a really exciting time for alternatives,” he says, pointing to new plastics engineered from vegetable sources, such as sugarcane and corn fibers, that can be molded into con-tainers, knives and forks, and even fast-food trays. For diners trying to keep track of more than just calories, the GRA has a searchable online database (www.dinegreen.com/restaurant _guide.asp) of more than 100 member establishments in 20 states.

Despite the packaging progress made by some chains, fast food does not necessarily a culinary experience make. Consequently, picky eaters face a deeper quandary when it comes to getting a local bistro or favorite pizzeria to shift priorities. In some areas of the country you can take it upon yourself to suggest participation in efforts such as Northern California’s Bay Area Green Business Program, which spans seven counties and works with the greater business community to improve conservation practices. Likewise, the GRA website has printable suggestion cards that you can leave with the bill to encourage staff to contact the association. But don’t be surprised if you get the brush-off; talking to restaurateurs, I found that between time crunches, staff crises, and the bottom line, environmental discussions rarely rise above the level of background noise.

Accordingly, the best way to beat back your reservations about making reservations is to alter your own consumer behavior. This means making the effort to take a meal sitting instead of on the run, thereby opening the door to using metal silverware, real plates, and glassware—all of which can be washed and reused. It also helps to order only the amount you’re ready to consume, which eliminates the need for a doggie bag. Finally, don’t be a hippie-phobe: Like that guy with the canvas sack ahead of you in the supermarket line, invest in a few Tupperware-type containers and a travel mug (Starbucks will even give you a dime off your beverage if you bring your own cup). Then keep them handy for when hunger calls.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate