Ohio Judges Are Releasing People From Jails to Fight Coronavirus. It’s a Good Idea.

“Continued incarceration will be a death sentence.”

FrankvandenBergh/Getty

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

To keep the novel coronavirus from spreading, public health officials are urging everyone to stay at home and distance themselves from others. But for the 2 million people in jails and prisons across the country, often crammed into crowded holding cells or dorm-style housing units, that’s simply not possible: Incarceration creates a perfect breeding ground for infections. In the United States, no inmates have tested positive for the virus yet, but public health experts believe it’s only a matter of time: China saw an explosion of cases across its prisons in February. In Iran, officials announced earlier this month they would release more than 54,000 prisoners to try to prevent the disease from spreading there.

In the United States, prisons and jails have so far resisted calls to release large groups of incarcerated people, despite warnings from public health and correctional experts about the dangers of crowded cells. But over the weekend, judges in Cleveland, Ohio, became some of the first to really take these warnings to heart: A county court held emergency hearings to let dozens of jail detainees go home early, with the goal of sending hundreds more back to their communities as soon as possible.

Thirty-eight people were released from the Cuyahoga County Jail after emergency hearings on Saturday, according to local reporters at a Fox affiliate and Cleveland.com. Some of these detainees went home on bond, while others were sentenced to probation or community service or time served. More hearings are ramping up at the county’s common pleas court this week, and a local judge said he hoped to soon release as many as 300 people from the jail, aiming to free up more space for quarantines at the facility if they are needed. “We know that eventually that virus is going to hit our jail,” Brendan Sheehan, the presiding judge of the county’s common pleas court, told Cleveland.com. “If that virus hits our jail, our jail will not be able to operate, and everything will be crippled.” Criminal justice reform advocates applauded the move: “Other jails should follow,” Udi Ofer, the director of the ACLU’s Justice Division, wrote in a tweet.

Some of those released in Cleveland had been arrested for nonviolent drug charges or poverty-related crimes. One woman who was jailed for drug possession pleaded guilty Saturday during her arraignment hearing; the judge allowed her to go home that day by sentencing her to time served. Another woman facing charges for fentanyl possession was sentenced to probation and drug treatment during her hearing. While the court prioritized punishments like these that allowed people to return to their communities, some defendants were sentenced to prison, where they will continue to face heightened odds of infection.

In San Francisco, meanwhile, attorneys are also trying to release more people from lockup. Last week, the city’s public defender announced his office would ask courts to immediately free anyone sentenced to county jail with less than six months remaining on their sentence, as well as all clients held pretrial who are at heightened risk for getting sick—a fairly large group, given that many people booked into jails have preexisting health conditions. The city’s new chief prosecutor, Chesa Boudin, said he would not oppose the release of pretrial detainees facing misdemeanor charges or drug-related felony charges as long as they pose no threat to public safety. He urged his team of prosecutors to help more people leave confinement early by offering plea deals that take into account the time they have already waited in jail.

Other jurisdictions around the country are trying to slow the speed at which people are jailed in other ways. Some are postponing nonessential criminal court hearings, unless the defendant is already in custody. Sheriffs in some counties are urging police not to put people into jail who are accused of nonviolent crimes or misdemeanors. State and federal prisons have also announced temporary bans on transfers between facilities or visits from family members.

But many criminal justice advocates say that won’t be enough, arguing that prison outbreaks will be unavoidable unless more drastic measures are taken. In New York, Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez last week joined criminal justice advocates and public health experts in asking Gov. Andrew Cuomo to grant emergency clemencies to prisoners who are elderly or sick, as my colleague Madison Pauly reported last week. Some advocacy groups are now calling for their jurisdictions to follow the lead of the Ohio judges. “During this pandemic, incarcerated people are at increased risk of exposure and death,” the ACLU of Florida, Dream Defenders, and other criminal justice reform groups wrote in a statement urging courts in Miami to release more people from jails who have short sentences or are there pretrial. “Continued incarceration will be a death sentence.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate