Mexico’s New Super-Cartel Ups Violence in Power Play

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When we published a special drug issue last year, the Mexican cartels were intensifying border violence as the scrabbled for territory in urban hubs like Ciudad Juarez and Nuevo Laredo. Nearly a year later, the landscape has changed dramatically. The once-small splinter group called Los Zetas is now a cartel in their own right, and a powerful one. The Zetas are growing so dominant that the long-time rival Gulf and Sinaloa (and according to some reports, La Familia Michoacana) cartels have actually joined forces to fight them, merging into a super-cartel known as the New Federation. Last month, the New Federation put a message to the Mexican people on YouTube, saying that “Without the ‘Z’ you will live without fear… If you are a Zeta, run because the MONSTER is coming… the new alliance have raised their weapons to fuck the Zetas because they have undermined the drug trafficking business with their kidnappings, extortions, etc. To sum it up, they don’t give a shit about the freedom and tranquility of the Mexican people.”

I’m not sure exactly how the New Federation thinks they’re such guardians for the Mexican people’s peace, but it’s kind of amazing they’ve come together as the Gulf and Sinaloa’s heads have (allegedly) been behind the murders of each other’s family members, dons, and foot soldiers. Desperate times call for desperate measures and Los Zetas, known for gruesome incidents like when they beheaded 12 people at a Yucatan ranch in 2008, have become too powerful to be ignored, controlling a territory that now goes down into Central America with training camps in Guatemala.

As STRATFOR reports, the cartels’ escalating and continued gun battles, including the recent Gulf-Sinaloa alliance against the Zetas, is having economic effects on Mexico, from discouraging tourism to the “willingness of foreign companies to invest in Mexico’s manufacturing sector.” STRATFOR writer Scott Stewart makes the valid point that in attempting to break up the cartels, Felipe Calderón may have broken them but with the result of increased violence as the organizations react to structural changes:

This weakening of the traditional cartels was part of the Calderon administration’s publicized plan to reduce the power of the drug traffickers and to deny any one organization or cartel the ability to become more powerful than the state. The plan appears to have worked to some extent, and the powerful Gulf and Sinaloa cartels have splintered, as has the AFO. The fruit of this policy, however, has been incredible spikes in violence and the proliferation of aggressive new drug-trafficking organizations that have made it very difficult for any type of equilibrium to be reached. So the Mexican government’s policies have also been a factor in destabilizing the balance.

The balance of power is a key factor in the cartels’ world, and events like arrests or murders of key cartel personnel have a destabilizing effect, opening up a power vacuum for the strong or opportunistic to fill. For example, the Zetas first came to power around 2003 when the Gulf cartels’ territory (see map above or here) was threatened after don Osiel Cárdenas was arrested. Sensing weakness, Sinaloa moved in to take over corridors in key cities like Nuevo Laredo, which sits just across the Mexican border from Laredo, Texas. To fight Sinaloa, Gulf employed the Zetas, many of whom used to be anti-drug soldiers for the Mexican police. As the Mexican police have focused on taking down the big cartels like Sinaloa and Gulf, the Zetas have had room to stretch their legs, taking over new territory and breaking off from their former Gulf allies. In that way, the Mexican government is trying to hit a moving target. But even when they do kill a key player, three more spring up to take his place.

The question for me is: If the Mexican government cannot totally stop the cartels, can they get them to an equilibrium that will help reduce violence to civilians? STRATFOR thinks this is unlikely, as “there are also very few levers with which the Calderon government can apply pressure to help force the shifting pieces into alignment.” In the long run, perhaps it would be best if there was just one cartel just dominant enough to keep the others in line, but not so powerful that it threatens usurping the Mexican government. New Federation may be that cartel… someday. As STRATFOR points out, while the New Federation is making some progress, “Los Zetas’ tactical skills and arms make them unlikely to be defeated easily.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate