Reformer Will Lead Probe Into Mining Disaster—But Will Government Back Him Up?

<a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mine_at_Leadfield.JPG">Wikimedia commons</a>.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Davitt McAteer, who has spent 40 years fighting for safety reforms in the coal mining industry, will head an independent inquiry into the disaster at Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch Mine. Unlike some of the investigations that follow high-profile industrial disasters, McAteer’s inquiry can be counted on to pull no punches. Whether his findings are acted upon and enforced, however, is another question. In an interview last week, McAteer told Mother Jones that the federal government all along had the authority to shut down the Upper Big Branch mine, which had “a record of terrible practices” and had been cited for numerous previous safety violations. The feds could have pulled the plug on Massey’s operations until the safety problems were fixed, he said, “if they had the balls.”

McAteer was appointed yesterday by West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin, but his inquiry, in which he’ll lead a panel of experts of his choosing, is to be independent of separate state and federal investigations. “I want a transparent third party, that’s not attached in any way, shape or form,” Manchin told the AP. The governor, who like everyone who’s held his position is friendly to the powerful coal mining industry in his state, now says he he wants to make sure state officials also have the right to shut down an unsafe mine. “If you have a serious violation that can cause what we had … either I have the right to shut you down, or you have to act immediately,” Manchin said. “I would rather err on the side of caution.”

According to the Wheeling News-Register, Manchin also said “We owe it to the families of the 29 miners we lost last week to find out what caused this. And we owe it to them and every coal miner working today to do everything humanly possible to prevent this from happening again.”  President Obama said something quite similar. But of course, these types of statements have been heard many times before. By now it is clear that even a hard-hitting investigation does not guarantee that changes will be mandated, implemented, or enforced. McAteer, who once headed up health and safety programs for the United Mine Workers and later served as an Assistant Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, was also tasked with leading the investigation that followed the 2006 Sago Mine disaster. His recommendations even helped bring about new mine safety legislation. But laws only work if they are enforced, and the mining industry has dragged its feet about implementing some changes. In addition, as has now been widely documented, the Mine Safety and Health Administration wrote up Massey dozens of times for recklessness and “high negligence.” Massey fought back against the citations and fines, and all the while kept on sending its workers into the mines. The MSHA never once used its power to shut down the Upper Big Branch mine—or any other mine, for that matter.

Without government enforcement to give them teeth, these mine disaster investigations have limited power to bring about any serious change for the better. It might be a different story if they had subpoena power, and used it; in this instance, that would almost certainly lead to criminal charges. Massey can only hope the investigations don’t end up putting company officials before a federal grand jury. If that were the case, any indictments would go before federal  judges, not to state courts, where the judges in the past have proven to be susceptible to bribes of one type or another. Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against a West Virginia judge whose decisions, the court said, had been unduly influenced by a $3 million campaign contribution from—none other than Massey coal. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate