Sub Captain Proves Gays Aren’t the Problem

Capt. R. Murray Gero, at right. <a href="http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=75727">US Navy photo</a> by Lt. Commander Greg Kuntz

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Capt. Ronald Murray Gero has had a hard month, and far be it from me to pile on him personally. But you’d think that the 35-year veteran of the service, a captain of two different nuclear subs who trains other sub skippers, would know better than to flirt on the phone while steering his Tomahawk missile-laden boat through hazardous Hawaiian waters.

You’d think.

The Navy yanked Gero from his job as commanding officer of the USS Ohio last month for what, at the time, it called a “loss of confidence” in his leadership, owing to “improper personal behavior that eroded good order and discipline.” New details unearthed by Navy Times this week show that the married Gero was engaging in a strange relationship with a female officer, to the point that he’d sloughed off his work. As right-wingers continue to insist that gays will corrupt the military and women will sink subs, an embarrasingly straight Gero goes down as the 15th ship’s captain to be fired this year for not-gay misconduct.

Pity Gero. If his biography and the comments on this submariner’s blog are indication, he had been a good officer. But in a (sometimes petty-sounding) report, the Navy insisted his affection for a mystery heartthrob clouded his ability to command a multibillion-dollar lethal weapon:

Then came the phone calls. During surface transits, Gero sometimes made calls on his government cell phone from the bridge atop the ship’s sail, in close proximity to others. They recalled Gero starting conversations with a vague greeting like “Hey you,” to avoid saying the person’s name, while covering the handset and speaking in a hushed tone. Sometimes, Gero would even say things like, “Our bosses wouldn’t be very happy if we did that.” This was in marked contrast to conversations with his wife, to whom he spoke in normal tones, shipmates said…

Calls to the woman distracted him July 24 when his vigilance was needed most: a transit out of port, according to phone records and the ship’s schedule, which were reviewed by investigators.

“It appears that Capt. Gero also lost focus of his mission on at least one occasion, where he was spending time talking to [name redacted] while piloting the [submarine] through Pearl Harbor’s restricted waters,” their report states.

Got all that? OK, now, consider this: Tony Perkins, head of the Family Research Council, lobbies against gays in the military by citing what he calls “legitimate worries about the consequences of increased sexual tension,” which “would threaten the readiness of the force.” And the Navy itself has defended its ban on women in subs by arguing (PDF) that making the boats gender-neutral “would significantly impact the submarine force’s already strained ability to meet valid operational requirements.” Translation: Gays and ladies would leave America’s military less prepared, and America less safe.

You know, like jabbering on a cell phone to your schoolboy crush while trying to keep a 560-foot nuke boat in its safe-driving lane.

Once, in happier times, Gero gave a speech extolling the virtues of his straight-dude colleagues in the sub service. “Keep these men in mind,” he said, “for they are the present, and the future, of our country’s defense.”

Don’t you feel safer knowing Gero’s guys are on patrol? God forbid we should mess that up with queers and chicks.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate