Rocky Mountain High

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/7478565@N08/5141685355">snowstice</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Colorado on Tuesday night became the first state in the nation to legalize recreational marijuana, beating out Washington by about an hour.

Barring a legal challenge, anyone over the age of 21 can soon walk into a marijuana dispensary in the Rocky Mountain State and buy some bud—and not the kind made by Anheuser-Busch.

But the fight for legal weed in Colorado and around the country is far from over. Cracking down on pot is still a centerpiece of federal drug enforcement policy, and the feds may try to quash Colorado’s legal weed program before it gets started.

Take for example the experience of medical marijuana dispensaries in California, which, until now, has been seen as the leader of the marijuana movement. Two years ago, the Proposition 19 ballot initiative to legalize pot for those without a prescription fizzled in the face of withering attacks from law enforcement. Starting last year, the Department of Justice reversed its pledge to leave Golden State medical pot dispensaries alone, moving to shut down reputable outfits such as the Harborside Health Center in Oakland. So far, outcry from pot advocates and sympathetic politicos hasn’t caused them to back off.

Still, pot advocates say the experience in Colorado could be different. “Nobody knows what’s gong to happen,” says Tom Angell, a spokesperson for Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, “but I think if you see marijuana legalization getting more votes than either of the presidential candidates, which looks like a distinct possibility, and a number of states acting on this—Colorado and Washington—I think the political calculus begins to change. It is becoming a reality that nobody can deny.”

In a possible sign that the feds might come around to legal weed, US Attorney General Eric Holder declined to formally oppose the state’s legalization initiative, known as Amendment 64. In 2010, he opposed California’s Prop. 19.

And unlike in California, the federal government hasn’t raided Colorado marijuana dispensaries that comply with state and local laws. While that could be because Colorado is less high-profile than California, it also might be a product of the state’s more coherent regulatory system. (California mostly leaves medical pot regs up to individual cities). “I think the federal government has been more respectful of Colorado’s marijuana system because it is state and locally regulated,” says Mason Tvert, a spokesman for the Yes on 64 campaign. “So the federal government has not felt the need to interfere.”

To be sure, the Golden State deserves credit for seeding the idea that legalization isn’t just crazy talk. But Colorado also has a long history of progressivism when it comes to bucking the Puritans. Exactly 80 years ago, it legalized alcohol—well before the federal government ended prohibition. Amendment 64 wisely leaves the job of devising a regulatory system for legal weed up to the state legislature. It won’t be an easy task, but activists think they can pull it off. “We can show the rest of the nation that when you legalize marijuana, the sky does not fall,” Angell says. “That is can be safer and at the same time you can collect more tax money.” Call it the pot stimulus.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate