LA County Jail Deputies Accused of Trying to Thwart FBI Probe

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-129313061/stock-photo-hand-in-jail.html?src=WbHPcunL1hdyNitrlZfihQ-1-7"> sakhorn</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Reinforcing the Los Angeles County jail system’s reputation for brutality and corruption, FBI officials unsealed cases last week that charge 18 current and former deputy sheriffs with misconduct. The charges, from four grand jury indictments and a criminal complaint, were the result of an ongoing FBI investigation spurred by accusations of excessive force in the LA County Sheriff’s Department. US Attorney André Birotte Jr. said the cases encompass “a wide scope of illegal conduct,” including allegations of civil rights violations against prisoners and visitors, as well as conspiracy to hinder the FBI investigation itself.

Seven of those arrested face charges of civil rights violations against inmates and visitors, including the unlawful handcuffing and searching of the Austrian consul general as she attempted to visit an Austrian inmate.

To make matters worse, some of the officials under the FBI’s magnifying glass attempted to dodge or subvert the investigation. Seven officers at Men’s Central Jail, including two lieutenants and two sergeants, were indicted on charges of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and giving false statements. The case alleges that when the deputies discovered a smuggled cell phone in an inmate’s possession and realized he was acting as an informant to the FBI, they took drastic steps to hide him from the FBI—altering records to say he was released, re-booking him under a false name, and attempting to intimidate an FBI agent at her home. As the LA Times reported, the conspiring deputies internally referred to their plans to hide the informant and thwart the investigation as “Operation Pandora’s Box.”

The conspiring deputies internally referred to their plans to hide the informant and thwart the investigation as “Operation Pandora’s Box.”

The FBI’s arrests are all the more disturbing in light of accusations of extreme physical abuse that have marred LA County jails for years. In January 2012, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit against the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, stating that “a sick culture of deputy-on-inmate hyper-violence has been flourishing for decades.” A 2011 ACLU report documented 70 first-hand accounts of violence and threats against inmates, detailing broken bones, stitches, and lasting injuries from Tasers, pepper spray, and steel-toed boots. LA County Sheriff Lee Baca initially questioned the accuracy of the report, stating the ACLU didn’t “have any substantial proof other than accusations,” but later accepted blame for violence within his jails. It’s no surprise that former Mother Jones reporter James Ridgeway featured LA County jails prominently in his list of America’s 10 Worst Prisons.

In a press conference last week, Baca maintained the indictments do not represent the department as a whole, stating: “There is no institutional problem within the sheriff’s department when it comes to correcting itself.” But US Attorney Birotte saw it differently. “These incidents did not take place in a vacuum—in fact, they demonstrated behavior that had become institutionalized,” he said in a statement. “The pattern of activity alleged in the obstruction of justice case shows how some members of the Sheriffs’ Department considered themselves to be above the law.”

Federal involvement should come as welcome news to prison activists. In the ACLU’s 2011 report, corrections expert and former prison official Tony V. Bair concluded: “Sheriff Baca is either unwilling or unable to control the systemic abuse that permeates his LA County Jail system…Since the LASD appears totally incapable and lacking in motivation to correct these problems, it remains for the federal government and the courts to do so.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate