Video Shows Police Violently Arresting Nurse After She Refused to Let Him Take Patient’s Blood

In 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled warrantless blood tests were unconstitutional.

Update, October 11: Jeff Payne, the police officer who was filmed dragging a nurse out of a hospital after she refused to let him take an unconscious patient’s blood, was fired on Tuesday.

“I think I owe it to the body camera footage,” Alex Wubbels said, responding to the news of Payne’s dismissal. “Without that, my story would never have had the impact that it has had.”

Previously:

A Utah nurse is speaking out after she says she was assaulted and illegally arrested last month, after refusing to allow a Salt Lake City police officer take an unconscious patient’s blood. Footage of the July 26 incident was released Thursday, and it shows detective Jeff Payne dragging Alex Wubbels into a police car while she screams for help.

“I just feel betrayed, I feel angry. I feel a lot of things,” Wubbels, a nurse at the University of Utah Hospital, said in an press conference Thursday.

“The only job I have is to keep my patients safe,” she continued. “A blood draw, it just gets thrown around there like it’s some simple thing. But blood is your blood. That’s your property. And when a patient comes in in a critical state, that blood is extremely important and I don’t take it lightly.”

The video, which was recorded on a police body camera, shows Payne attempting to pressure Wubbels into handing over vials of blood he said he needed in order to determine whether a truck driver was under the influence during a car accident that left one person dead. Wubbels is seen calmly explaining that the driver was not under arrest, nor did Payne have an electronic warrant or the patient’s consent, which are required in order to draw blood from an unconscious person in the hospital.

“I don’t know, I have no idea why he’s blaming me,” Wubbels told her supervisor, who was on speakerphone during the tense standoff.

“Why are you blaming the messenger, sir?” the supervisor asked Payne.

“She was the one who has told me no,” he responded.

“Yes sir, but you’re making a huge mistake right now. You’re making a huge mistake because you’re threatening a nurse.”

Payne then appears to erupt in anger, as he forcefully places Wubbels under arrest. She was eventually released and no charges were filed.

An internal investigation into the incident is ongoing. As of this time, Wubbels says she is not planning legal action.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate